OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

trans-ws message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [trans-ws] Collaborative editing of the spec


 
 
Sorry for the silence...
 
If you all agree to use this, please go ahead. I am still catching up with
things that did not get done last week and things that started during the
conference.
 
Reinhard
-----Original Message-----
From: Reynolds, Peter [mailto:Peter.Reynolds@bowneglobal.ie]
Sent: 27 September 2004 08:46
To: Magnus Martikainen; Stephen.Flinter@connectcgs.com;
trans-ws@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [trans-ws] Collaborative editing of the spec



Hi Magnus, Stephen, All,
 
I was waiting for Reinhard to have a look at this. He was the person who
expressed a preference for using word rather than learning new technologies.
I spoke with him on Wednesday and suggested he talk with Stephen but he was
in the middle of the LRC conference which he organises so I am not sure that
he got around to this. I think if we are all agreed that this would be a
good system we can just go ahead with it, but I would like to hear
Reinhard's comments.
 
Thanks,
 
Peter.

  _____  

From: Magnus Martikainen [mailto:magnus@trados.com] 
Sent: 24 September 2004 18:09
To: Stephen.Flinter@connectcgs.com; trans-ws@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [trans-ws] Collaborative editing of the spec



Hi all,

 

I would suggest that we give this a try. Any other opinions? If not:

*	When can we start? 

*	Do we need a ballot to determine whether we go ahead with this? 

*	Do we need to put together some official guidelines? Or should we
perhaps simply run with it for now and see how it works? 

*	Do we need any type of protection for this site, to avoid external
access? 

 

Cheers,
Magnus

 


  _____  


From: Stephen.Flinter@connectcgs.com [mailto:Stephen.Flinter@connectcgs.com]

Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 11:20 PM
To: trans-ws@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [trans-ws] Collaborative editing of the spec

 


Magnus, 

1. The wiki supports this automatically.  When you edit and update a page,
the page has a link 'Back in time' at the bottom.  You can use this to track
changes, and rollback if necessary.  At present, this mechanism is pretty
rudimentary, but I believe that the developers are working on something more
sophisticated. 
2. The notifications are handled through RSS.  Check out www.bloglines.com
for a web based RSS aggregator, or FeedDemon
(http://www.bradsoft.com/feeddemon/index.asp) for a windows based one, if
you're not familiar with RSS.  Effectively, what will happen is if you
subscribe to the feed, your feed aggregator will poll it on a regular basis
(say every 2 hours), and you'll see any changes there. 
3 & 4.  The idea behind wikis is that everybody can add whatever they like,
and that through the editing process it all gets cleaned up properly.  What
I would suggest is that people put their own contributions & annotations
directly onto the appropriate page, and we can remove all of this in the
final publication.  The typical approach that you see in wikis is that
people surround their own contribution with horizontal lines (e.g. see the
note on this page: http://212.147.140.51:2500/wiki/show/requestQuote to see
what I mean). 

Obviously, people will have to be sensible about how they edit this, and not
just change anything they want just because it suits them. 

Anyway, good to hear that there is some appetite for this. 

Regards, 

Steve 

---------------------------------------------
Stephen Flinter
Connect Global Solutions
[t] +353 (0)1 882 9038
[f] +353 (0)1 882 9050
[m] +353 87 798 1228
[e] stephen.flinter@connectcgs.com
[w] www.connectcgs.com
-------------------------------------------- 




"Magnus Martikainen" <magnus@trados.com> 

21/09/2004 18:07 


To

<Stephen.Flinter@connectcgs.com>, <trans-ws@lists.oasis-open.org> 


cc

 


Subject

RE: [trans-ws] Collaborative editing of the spec

 


 

 




Hi Stephen, 
  
This is a great initiative! I am all for it, it should help us a lot to keep
the specs up-to-date if everyone that identifies an issue can go in and
change it directly. 
But obviously with that freedom comes some responsibility, and I guess we
may need to put together some guidelines for how we should work. 
  
I am not familiar with Wiki or RSS so I have a couple of questions: 
* Is it possible to track the history of the content, retrieve an "old"
version, or see exactly what changes has been done and perhaps reverting to
an earlier version? 
* Is it possible to get notifications when content is changed and to see
what changes were made? 
* It could be useful to be able to do edit the content as a "change
proposal" without it explicitly being part of the "official" content until
it has been signed off by others. Would this be possible? 
* Is it possible to annotate changes with comments explaining why they were
made? 
  
Thanks a lot for taking your time in setting this up! 
Magnus 
  
  

 


  _____  



From: Stephen.Flinter@connectcgs.com [mailto:Stephen.Flinter@connectcgs.com]

Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 3:51 AM
To: trans-ws@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [trans-ws] Collaborative editing of the spec 
  

All, 

given that a number of people are tasked with editing the spec, I thought
that a collaborative environment such as a wiki might be useful.  To that
end, I spent a few hours creating a wiki, and making it publically
available. 

Check out: http://212.147.140.51:2500 

For those of you who use RSS feed aggregators, there is also as RSS feed
available, so you can follow progress on the doc:
http://212.147.140.51:2500/wiki/rss_with_content 

The wiki engine (Instiki - www.instiki.org) is supposed to have PDF & LaTeX
export functionalaity, but that appears to be broken at the moment.
However, when I get that sorted, it should mean that we can produce a
printable copy of the spec directly from the wiki. 

Take a look, and let me know what you think, and whether you reckon it's
worth pursuing with this approach, or whether the posted/emailed Word docs
are better. 

Peter, if you're happy with this approach, feel free to post a link on the
TransWS home page.  I'll keep the wiki server up for the duration of the
development of the spec (and perhaps move it to a more permanent home if
this exercise is successful). 

Regards, 

Steve 

---------------------------------------------
Stephen Flinter
Connect Global Solutions
[t] +353 (0)1 882 9038
[f] +353 (0)1 882 9050
[m] +353 87 798 1228
[e] stephen.flinter@connectcgs.com
[w] www.connectcgs.com
--------------------------------------------

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
********************************************************************** 


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]