[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Notes for Sep 17th call
Minutes for the meeting of the Electronic Identity Credential Trust Elevation Methods (Trust Elevation) Technical Committee September 17, 2015. 1. Call to Order and Welcome. 2. Roll Call Attending (please notify me if you attended the meeting but are not on the list below)
We achieved quorum. 2. Agenda review and approval
We used the following chat room for the call: http://webconf.soaphub.org/conf/room/trust-el The agenda was approved. 3. Approval of the Minutes Andrew asked for a motion to approve the minutes of August 6 and August 20. Abbie made the motion. Peter seconded it. There were no objections. The minutes were approved. 4. Editors Update
Andrew sent out a cleaned-up draft that was also sent to ITU Question 10 group. ITU has warmly received the draft and would like to receive the final version. We should be able to submit the final version in March.
Andrew looked into moving the draft through the formal OASIS process. It is on a standards track. First we need to finish the document. We also need a full vote with majority approval to approve the document.
Peter said we need to discuss who we have to present it to.
Abbie responded that we have to approve it ourselves. Then can send it for OASIS review. We can run a ballot. We want it approved before the next ITU meeting. If we back track from that date, we will get an idea of how long we can have the draft be in active review at the TC. He suggested targeting March 1 as the submission date to ITU.
Andrew said once we have finished this draft, next we need to make it a committee draft.
Abbie asked Andrew to get information about the OASIS process to generate the approval checklist so that Andrew can set up the intermediate deadlines.
Andrew announced this is the final call for content.
John raised the issue of XACML contribution.
Andrew explained that the UMA contribution is included. Shaheen has some outstanding edits. If there are still empty sections, we may strike them. Andrew has more work to do on the implementation considerations section.
Abbie had one piece of feedback from ITU. There is a reference to ISO 29115. There is a movement to make changes to it that may impact the text, so there is a suggestion to move it to different section of the deliverable so that it is non-normative.
Peter noted that 29115 is an acknowledged standard now. When 29115 changes, we may need to make changes.
Andrew will double check the status of 29115.
Abbie will send Andrew information on the status of 29115.
Andrew asked is our path forward logical?
There were no objections.
Orlando responded that its sounds good.
Andrew reiterated that our goal is to get final draft to the TC by our next call and get the time line chart ready as well. Any comments are greatly appreciated between now and then. Otherwise the comments will be captured during the balloting process.
Abbie reported that next week, on Tuesday, Sep 22nd at a conference in Tampa, he is running a panel on use of biometrics and will be talking about trust elevation.
*** Abbie took an action item to send notice of the meeting to the list.
This conference is co-located with the IDESG meeting.
5. Adjourn
Andrew moved to adjourn the meeting. Suzanne seconded the motion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
anonymous morphed into Peter
anonymous morphed into Rick Grow
Andrew Hughes: hi folks!
anonymous morphed into Orlando Adams
Peter: what is the dial in #?
abbie: (214) 556-4103; PC 58 5 07 44 9 77.
abbie: (877) 658-8148 , (214) 556-4103; PC 58 5 07 44 9 77. LC: 49 97 65 96 25
Peter: tak
Diana Proud-Madruga: is there a webex?
Suzanne Gonzales-Webb: nothing is being shared today |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]