Notes for February 4th meeting

["Mary Ruddy" <mary@meristic.com>]

Minutes for the meeting of the Electronic Identity Credential Trust Elevation Methods (Trust Elevation) Technical Committee

February 4, 2016.

1. Call to Order and Welcome.

 

2. Roll Call

 

Attending (please notify me if you attended the meeting but are not on the list below)

 

Abbie Barbir, Bank of America - y

Andrew Hughes - y

Anil Saldhana, Red Hat  

Bob Sunday

Brendan Peter, CA

Carl Mattocks, Bofa 

Cathy Tilton, Daon    

Charline Duccans, DHS

Duane DeCouteau

Calvin

Colin Wallis, New Zealand Government - y   

Dale Rickards, Verizon Business 

David Brossard, Axiomatics 

Dazza Greenwood 

Debbie Bucci, NIH 

Deborah Steckroth, RouteOne LLC

Detlef Huehnlein, Federal Office for Information

Diana Proud-Madruga - y    

Diego Matute, Centrify

Don Thibeau, Open Identity Exchange  - y     

Doron Cohen, SafeNet

Doron Grinstein, BiTKOO

Gershon Janssen - y  

Ilene Bridges 

Ivonne Thomas, Hasso Plattner Institute

Jaap Kuipers, Amsterdam  

James Clark – Oasis

Jeff Broburg, CA

Jeff Shultz , NIST 

Jim Macabe (Kaiser)

John Bradley 

John "Mike" Davis, Veteran's Affairs 

John Tolbert - y

John Walsh, Sypris Electronics

Jonas Hogberg

Julian Hamersley, Adv Micro Devices

Kevin Mangold, NIST   

Lucy Lynch  ISOC

Marcus Streets, Thales e-Security

Marty Schleiff, The Boeing Company

Mary Ruddy, Identity Commons  - y

Massimiliano Masi, Tiani "Spirit" GmbH 

Mike Harrop

Mohammad Jafari, ESC 

Orlando Adams

Peter Alterman, SAFE-BioPharma  - y  

Peter Jones -

Rainer Hoerbe -

Rebecca Nielsen, Booz Allen Hamilton  

Rich Furr

Rick Grow - y

Ronald Perez, Advanced Micro Devices

Scott Fitch Lockeed Martin

Shaheen Abdul Jabbar, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. - y  

Shahrokh Shahidzadeh (Intel Corp)   

Suzanne Gonzales-Webb, VA  

Tony Rutkowski

Tony Nadlin

Thomas Hardjono, M.I.T.  

William Barnhill, Booz Allen Hamilton

Adrianne James, VA 

Patrick, Axiomatics

Steve Olshansky

 

We achieved quorum.

 

2. Agenda review and approval

We used the following chat room for the call: http://webconf.soaphub.org/conf/room/trust-el

 

The agenda was approved.

 

Abbie suggested that we should consider moving to monthly calls as the paper goes thru the review process.

 

3. Approval of the Minutes

 

Abbie made a motion to approve any unapproved minutes

Don seconded the motion.

There were no objections.

The minutes were approved.

 

4. Editors Update

Andrew reported that we did get some feedback.  We need to respond to each of the comments.  He didn’t’ see any technical comments.  What does the rest of the group feel?

Peter commented that he felt they were mostly editorial in nature.

Abbie said based on what he has seen, we will just address them and proceed.  Abbie asked Andrew if he agreed.

Andrew replied that there are 17 in total.  There are 2 classes of comments.  Nine of them are broken URLs and linkage wording. The remaining ones relate to tidying up the language in the conformance section. The comment from Colin’s colleague was about consistency of reference.

It will take Andrew some time to determine what the language changes should be to clarify the text.

Abbie explained that the way it has to be done is you need to generate a table with all the inputs and how they were addressed.

Andrew responded that he has created the comment disposition table and has started with the most straight forward ones.

Abbie continued. We need to have a comment disposition meeting before you change the document.  If we agreed, then we can proceed with changing the doc.  He doesn’t want someone to come back.  So we should get the comment resolution, send it to the TC, and meet and then follow-up.  This cannot be done by the next meeting.

So we will cancel the next meeting.

Abbie asked for volunteers for the comment disposition meeting and to let Andrew know.

All the editors and the chairs should be on it. 

Abbie said we still need to send a liaison to the ITU-T. He will be sending a proposal to the ITU-T to do work based on this input.

Abbie asked for a motion to send the draft to the ITU-T.

Dianna made a motion to send the draft deliverable to the ITU-T.

Peter seconded it.

There were no objections.

The motion passed.

**Action item: Abbie to send the draft deliverable to the ITU-T to do work based on this input.

There was no more business.

5. Adjourn

Colin

Don seconded.

Abbie asked for a motion to adjourn.

Shaheen moved to adjourn the meeting.

Suzanne seconded.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 

anonymous morphed into Gershon Janssen

anonymous morphed into John Tolbert

Andrew Hughes: hi all - listening to hold music...

Andrew Hughes: why can't these concall services use music that is sampled correctly & has no static?

Andrew Hughes: too much distortion!

Peter: It's punishment for early arrival.

Andrew Hughes: no kidding

Andrew Hughes: i find it amazing that every single one has the same flaw

Andrew Hughes: on some the cassette tape is worn down so they have tape speed issues - lurching tunes

Peter: As John Arbuckle said, "You get what you pay for."

anonymous morphed into Don Thibeau

anonymous morphed into Rick Grow