Re: [ubl-cmsc] ebXML as basis for UBL context work?

[Eduardo Gutentag <eduardo.gutentag@sun.com>]

Matthew Gertner wrote:
> 
> Okay, we're ready to move forward on discussing rhe individual issues!
> Here's the first one. I'll send off the others in separate threads so that
> the discussion stays structured.
> 
> 1) Do we consider the "Document Assembly and Context Rules" document from
> Vienna (v1.04) to be the starting point for our work, which we will be
> refining? Or so we want to start from a clean slate and pull in input from
> the document as needed? The question here is whether people consider the
> Vienna work to be deeply broken in some way or whether it simply needs to be
> finalized.

I haven't heard anyone say "the Vienna work" is deeply broken. However, I'm
probably hard of hearing when it comes to certain things ;-)

But I agree that, if someone does believe there are deep problems with v1.04,
problems that in fact cannot be fixed, this is the time to speak up.

> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

-- 
Eduardo Gutentag               |         e-mail: eduardo.gutentag@Sun.COM
XML Technology Center          |         Phone:  (510) 986-3651 x73651
Sun Microsystems Inc.          |