Re: [ubl-cmsc] Context Rule Syntax

[Eduardo Gutentag <eduardo.gutentag@sun.com>]

Matthew Gertner wrote:
> 
> 7) Syntax of the context rules in general. Assuming that we decide to use a
> canonical syntax language (probably XSD), should we align the names of the
> context tags so they match the tags in the schema language? 

What would be the advantage?

I can see the disadvantage of doind this and then selecting another schema language,
or preferring not to select another schema language because we're already 
committed to this...

> Can we handle
> all of the various constructs (global types, local types, local elements,
> etc.) that are retained by the Naming and Design subcommittee? 

No idea.

> Are any of
> the constructs redundant (e.g. what is the different between "CreateElement"
> and an "Add" tag containing and "Element" tag)?

I think we'd have to go through this one by one, but probably in the context
of question (8) rather than in this context.

> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

-- 
Eduardo Gutentag               |         e-mail: eduardo.gutentag@Sun.COM
XML Technology Center          |         Phone:  (510) 986-3651 x73651
Sun Microsystems Inc.          |