[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-cmsc] Transformation Language
I think we should have a custom XML vocabulary for expressing context rules, which can then be "compiled" into an XSLT stylesheet for actually executing the rules. A custom vocabulary allows it to do one job well and makes it easier to build GUIs that let people create instances of it. (I also think that it should be a hard requirement to express only context rules that at least theoretically can be executed using XSLT, though it's hard to imagine needing a capability that would be counter to this goal. XSLT should be our proof-of-concept method for testing the language we design.) Eve At 04:20 PM 11/16/01 +0100, Matthew Gertner wrote: >4) Should the transformation be represented as an adhoc XML document (like >the Vienna approach) or using some standard transformation language (such as >XSLT)? -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center eve.maler @ sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC