RE: [ubl-cmsc] Additive or Subtractive Methodology?

[Matthew Gertner <matthew.gertner@schemantix.com>]

Okay, let's wait for Arofan.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eve L. Maler [mailto:eve.maler@sun.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:47 PM
> To: ubl-cmsc@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [ubl-cmsc] Additive or Subtractive Methodology?
> 
> 
> Arofan's position paper on this subject for the NDR group should be 
> available tomorrow; it sounds as if he is planning to 
> advocate a limited 
> kind of subtraction as a first step and a general kind of 
> addition as a 
> second step.  I'd like to see where he goes with this before 
> weighing in.
> 
>          Eve
> 
> At 04:19 PM 11/16/01 +0100, Matthew Gertner wrote:
> >3) Are we assuming an additive methodology based on minimal 
> components, a
> >subtractive methodology based on maximal components or a
> >combination of both?
> 
> --
> Eve Maler                                    +1 781 442 3190
> Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center   eve.maler @ sun.com
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>