RE: [ubl-cmsc] Assembly Rules

[Matthew Gertner <matthew.gertner@schemantix.com>]

Totally agree. Any dissenters?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eve L. Maler [mailto:eve.maler@sun.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:11 PM
> To: ubl-cmsc@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [ubl-cmsc] Assembly Rules
> 
> 
> I got the impression that since the UBL effort will produce canonical 
> document types, and since we're planning to allow for 
> customization of 
> those types, building up new document types from the 
> component pieces isn't 
> really an immediate need.  But I'm willing to believe that my 
> lack of ebXML 
> experience may have led me astray.
> 
>          Eve
> 
> At 04:22 PM 11/16/01 +0100, Matthew Gertner wrote:
> >6) Do we still need assembly rules? There has been 
> discussion that the
> >construction of larger BIEs from core components using 
> standard schema
> >languages eliminates the need for a separate assembly language.
> 
> --
> Eve Maler                                    +1 781 442 3190
> Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center   eve.maler @ sun.com
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>