RE: [ubl-cmsc] Context Rule Syntax

[Matthew Gertner <matthew.gertner@schemantix.com>]

Okay, maybe we should test this based on some usage cases (my next mail). I
would tend to agree with your comment on naming (i.e. stay away from being
too XSD specific).

Matt

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eduardo Gutentag [mailto:eduardo.gutentag@sun.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 1:11 AM
> To: Matthew Gertner
> Cc: 'ubl-cmsc@lists.oasis-open.org'
> Subject: Re: [ubl-cmsc] Context Rule Syntax
> 
> 
> Matthew Gertner wrote:
> > 
> > 7) Syntax of the context rules in general. Assuming that we 
> decide to use a
> > canonical syntax language (probably XSD), should we align 
> the names of the
> > context tags so they match the tags in the schema language? 
> 
> What would be the advantage?
> 
> I can see the disadvantage of doind this and then selecting 
> another schema language,
> or preferring not to select another schema language because 
> we're already 
> committed to this...
> 
> > Can we handle
> > all of the various constructs (global types, local types, 
> local elements,
> > etc.) that are retained by the Naming and Design subcommittee? 
> 
> No idea.
> 
> > Are any of
> > the constructs redundant (e.g. what is the different 
> between "CreateElement"
> > and an "Add" tag containing and "Element" tag)?
> 
> I think we'd have to go through this one by one, but probably 
> in the context
> of question (8) rather than in this context.
> 
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
> 
> -- 
> Eduardo Gutentag               |         e-mail: 
> eduardo.gutentag@Sun.COM
> XML Technology Center          |         Phone:  (510) 986-3651 x73651
> Sun Microsystems Inc.          |
>