[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-cmsc] Proposed time for call
You had not before asked about 2:30 Tuesdays (only 9 or 4:30 I believe). I do have a conflict with 2:30 Tuesdays, and although I may be able to change that, I may not be able to. But 2:30 would also make it quite difficult for Asian participants (Jon has had a difficult time getting agreement to have the Pacific coordination meeting to happen before 4:30), and it does conflict with your 'rationale #2' listed below. It's not great for Europe, but it seemed to me that we were beginning to get some of our first customization feedback from the Pac Rim (through the l10n scs and others), and since our meetings up to now have for the most part kept that area of the globe out of the loop in real-time discussions, it seems reasonable to have this occur during a time that those folks can participate. My other thought is that it would be best to leave it at the original time option you had set out, since I assume you arrived at that time from some original query results and would have to start over if you're to introduce a new time? Just my 2 cents. -A Fabio Arciniegas wrote: >Dear all, >From the information I have it seems nobody would have an issue with >Tuesdays 2:30 pacific time. Please speak now if you do have an issue, >otherwise I suggest we move ahead with that option. > >All the best, > F. > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: CRAWFORD, Mark [mailto:MCRAWFORD@lmi.org] >>Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 4:10 PM >>To: Fabio Arciniegas; Ubl-Cmsc@Lists. Oasis-Open. Org >>Subject: RE: [ubl-cmsc] Proposed time for call >>Sensitivity: Private >> >> >>Fabio, >> >>I had been hoping to shift my attention from NDR to CMSC once the >>ndr document is out. Unfortunately, I will never be able to join >>at this time. If the calls are subsequently moved to occur >>during 6am until 3:30 pm on weekdays I will be able to join and >>participate. >> >>Mark >> >>________________________________ >> >>From: Fabio Arciniegas [mailto:Fabio.Arciniegas@postgraphy.com] >>Sent: Sat 3/13/2004 9:58 AM >>To: Ubl-Cmsc@Lists. Oasis-Open. Org >>Subject: RE: [ubl-cmsc] Proposed time for call >> >> >> >>The option with less conflicts was #3. The goal then is to have the CMSC >>meeting Tuesdays 4:30pm pacific time. >> >>I will send the appropriate reminder with the phone number etc. >>on mondays. >>All the best, >> F. >> >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Fabio Arciniegas [mailto:Fabio.Arciniegas@postgraphy.com] >>>Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 11:26 AM >>>To: Ubl-Cmsc@Lists. Oasis-Open. Org >>>Subject: [ubl-cmsc] Proposed time for call >>>Sensitivity: Private >>> >>> >>>Dear all, >>>After some consideration, I suggest we do one of the following options >>>(rationale at the end of this email) >>> >>>1. Tuesday 9 am pacific time (little late for our asian friends, but >>>apparently better for our american/european majority) >>> >>>2. Friday 9 am pacific time >>> >>>3. Tuesday 4:30 pm pacific time >>> >>>4. Friday 4:30 pm pacific time. >>> >>>Please send me a private email stating which of these options >>> >>> >>you can and >> >> >>>can't live without. (e.g: 1-Yes 2-No 3-Yes 4-Yes) so we can come to a >>>decision. >>> >>>All the best, >>> F. >>> >>> >>>ps. Rationale: >>> >>>1. No conflict with other UBL meetings: >>> >>> Monday: 7am LSC (monthly), 4:30pm Pacific Coordination >>> Tuesday: 7am LCSC >>> Wednesday: 8am CSC, 9am NDRSC, 10:30am CLSC >>> Thursday: 8am TTSC, 10am FPSC, 11:30am ISC >>> Friday: 7am Packaging/QA team >>> >>>2. If no comfortable time for all is available, try to make it >>> >>> >>decent at >> >> >>>least for a majority. >>> - No mid-day PST because it ends being evening for UK, night for >>>most of the rest of Europe, and middle of the night for Asia >>> >>>3. Try to avoid too many back-to-back UBL meetings >>> - Tuesday and friday only have ONE other meeting, whereas monday, >>>wednesday, and thursday all have two or trhee. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>.- >>> >>>Fabio Arciniegas - Chief Technical Officer | "So far as I can >>> >>> >>remember, >> >> >>> Postgraphy, LLC : there is not one word in >>> | the Gospels in praise of >>> http://www.postgraphy.com/about/faa | intelligence" - Bertrand >>>Russell >>> >>> >>> >>>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the >>>roster of the OASIS TC), go to >>>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-cmsc/members/leav >>> >>> >>e_workgroup.php. >> >> >> >> >>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the >>roster of the OASIS TC), go to >>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-cmsc/members/leav >> >> >e_workgroup.php. > > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the >OASIS TC), go to >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-cmsc/members/leave_workgrou >p.php. > > > > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-cmsc/members/leave_workgroup.php. > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]