[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: UBL 2.0 public review comments: link labels
Nice job. Here are some minor inconsistencies I've noticed. None of them is a show-stopper, but if you've got nothing better to do... Table of Contents ----------------- The TOC entry labeled "5 UBL 2.0 Process Context" links to section titled "5 Context of Use". The TOC entry labeled "Appendix C (Informative): UBL 2.0 Data Models" links to a section titled "Appendix C (Informative): UBL 2.0 Document Models". The TOC entry labeled "Appendix F (Informative): ASN.1" links to a section titled "Appendix F (Informative): ASN.1 Specification". Normative References -------------------- The [CCTS] entry refers to the CCTS as "ISO/TS 15000-5:2005 ... part 5" of the ebXML framework. However, the target document, dated 15 November 2003, calls itself "Part 8 of the ebXML Framework". Since this could confuse new readers (especially as both documents are identified as version 2.01), I'd suggest adding an explanation. The [XSD1] entry specifies the XSD recommendation dated 2 May 2001, but the first link points to the current version (dated 28 October 2004 when I checked). The second link points to the correct version. The [XSD2] entry specifies the XSD recommendation dated 2 May 2001, but the first link points to the current version (dated 28 October 2004 when I checked). The second link points to the correct version. - Stan ---Stan Swaren------- ---stan@swaren.com--- ------613.867.9694---
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]