Re: [ubl-comment] UBL LATAMR

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

Good morning, Carlos,

Thank you for your question, and for following 
the subcommittee instructions regarding the use 
of the UBL TC comment form for addressing 
"comments on the subcommittee's work" to the LATAMR localization subcommittee:

https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/index.php?wg_abbrev=ubl-latamr

However, as noted before (and for the benefit of 
readers), guidance on usage should be sought 
through the public developer list, UBL-Dev.  At 
this stage of exploration in your question I 
would not gauge its nature yet as a "comment on the subcommittee's work".

A kind and knowledgeable participant on that 
list, Kees Duvekot, has taken from his time to address your question there:

  https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-dev/201304/msg00007.html

That should be your initial source of guidance 
regarding the use of the UBL specification.  I 
believe members of the UBL Latin American 
Regional Localization Subcommittee are subscribed 
to UBL-Dev and can help with guidance on the use of the specification.

If after your deliberations there it is 
determined that something should be brought to 
the attention of LATAMR subcommittee members, 
that would be a suitable point at which to raise 
the issue on a formal basis using the UBL comment 
list and referencing "ubl-latamr" in the subject 
line, thus requiring a formal response.

For the benefit of readers (I can see that you've 
already found the SC page) the Latin American 
Regional Localization Subcommittee work is found here:

  https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ubl-latamr

I'll consider this particular comment addressed 
and closed for the time being.  If after due 
deliberation on UBL-Dev you determine you still 
have a comment on the LATAMR subcommittee's work, 
I invite you to submit that to this list.

Thank you for your enthusiastic interest in UBL!

. . . . . . . . . . Ken

At 2013-04-22 16:24 -0300, Carlos Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I work as IT Consulting in Argentina. I´m 
> Working in a company which have some branchs in 
> other South America Countries, and I want to ask 
> about the Address Object Class.
> The Addresses Format in South America 
> aren´t  the same in all Countries, and UBL 
> Address Object doesn´t have localization...
> The UBL LATAMR SubCommite, has produce some 
> localizations? or have I extend the address object.?
>
> thanks for your answer.
> Carlos.


--
Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training |
Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm |
Crane Softwrights Ltd.            http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ |
G. Ken Holman                   mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com |
Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about |
Legal business disclaimers:    http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal |