Re: [tab] Re: [ubl-comment] UBL Naming and Design Rules Version 3.0

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

At 2015-04-28 17:01 -0400, Patrick Durusau wrote:
> https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/TAB-1141
>
> is about as inelegant as is possible in English prose! Sorry! I will 
> try to clarify.
>
> I read the documentation conventions to mean:
>
> All *.1 subclauses are normative. (normative prescriptive rules in 
> the first subclause)
>
> All *.2 subclauses are non-normative. (non-normative UBL 2.13 
> Documents, libraries, components and extensions application of those 
> rules in the second subclause.)
>
> Yes?

Yes!

And I understand that the declared non-normative stature of clause 
3.2 is inherited by subclauses 3.2.1 through 3.2.4.  If such 
inheritance is not implied, then absolutely the editors are obliged 
to go in and declare the non-normative stature of those 
subclauses.  But if the inheritance is implied then I think it 
unnecessary to duplicate the declarations.

> If we are missing each other on that point, let me know so we can 
> get together there before I go any further.
>
> Hope the comments were helpful!

Absolutely, yes, and I hope you know how appreciative we are of your efforts.

. . . . . . . . Ken


--
Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources |
Free 5-hour lecture:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/video.htm |
Crane Softwrights Ltd.             http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ |
G. Ken Holman                    mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com |
Google+ profile:       http://plus.google.com/+GKenHolman-Crane/about |
Legal business disclaimers:     http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal |


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com