[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: SV: Change requests to QualificationApplication (request and/or Response) into UBL-2.2
I will forward your questions.
long time no see.
I have 2 questions regarding the EU comments:
a) Regarding No. 1 (substitue ContractFolderID by Procurmenet Project ID): it should be considered to use this consistently. Basicly for all the pre-award processes it would be “nicer” to use Procurement Project ID instead of Contract Foleder ID. But since semantics and syntax are mapped anyhow, the pre-award processes can live with ContractFolderID on the syntax level mapped to Project Reference Identifier on the semtantic level anyhow. See also Comment/proposed solution #12.
b) Is there some elaboration on #13/#14 and its intended use (which document) and the source of the requirement?
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Robert-Bürkle-Str. 1, D-85737 Ismaning/München
Comments from EU:
Followed by a question:
Wouldn’t it make sense having the evidences out the Response, at the root level? This way two or more responses could point at the one evidence that has been specified once (thus having more “generic” evidences).