Re: [ubl-comment] Missing WithholdingTax item in CreditNodeLine

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

Thank you for this input to the UBL committee.

Your issue has been assigned to the Post Award Subcommittee to be 
addressed.  The issue is deferred to UBL 2.3 as we have closed new 
requirements for UBL 2.2 that is currently in progress.

The following ticket has been created to ensure your issue is 
properly addressed:

  https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-139

Thank you, again, for your assistance to make UBL better.

. . . . . . . Ken

p.s. I, too, find the schemas hard to read which is why I created the 
HTML reports in the first place.  Both the HTML reports and the XSD 
schemas are synthesized from the genericode expression of the CCTS 
model for UBL, and so it is expected one need never actually look in 
the XSDs but can find everything needed to know for a UBL instance 
from the HTML report, including all attributes for all BBIEs

At 2017-09-29 12:10 +0100, David Goodenough wrote:

> I notice that the Invoice and CreditNote objects both have WithholdingTax
>
> entries, but while the InvoiceLine object has a WithholdingTax entry, the
>
> CreditNoteLine object does not. Logically it should have.
>
>
>
> It would seem that the DebitNoteLine is also missing the WithholdingTax
>
> entry.
>
>
>
> I am taking this from 
> http:/docs/oasis-open.org/ubl/csprd01-UBL/mod/summary/reports/UBL-CreditNote-2.2/html#Table_CreditNodeLine.Details, 
> I have not
>
> checked the schema (I find them hard to read).
>
>
>
> David


--
Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ |
Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources |
Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @ US$45 (5 hours free) |