Re: [ubl-comment] Multiple suppliers invoicing on one document

["G. Ken Holman" <g.ken.holman@gmail.com>]

Thank you, Jeroen, for your submission to the UBL 
Comment list.  I note this is not specific to the 
scope of the current public review of UBL 2.2, but comments are always welcome.

At this time the document-level aggregates are 
not candidates for use in other documents.  The 
question comes to mind if this proposed 
collection of invoices is, itself, a new business 
document, or is it the responsibility of other 
layers, such as using envelopes, to address 
this.  OASIS has a business document envelope 
here, soon to be superceded by the new Exchange Header Envelope:

  http://docs.oasis-open.org/bdxr/bdx-bde/v1.1/bdx-bde-v1.1.html

Nevertheless, I have created this ticket to discuss your point in committee:

  https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-175

In the meantime, I recommend you open a 
discussion on the unmoderated UBL Dev maillist:

  https://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
  https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-dev/

There you may find other suggestions regarding meeting your need.

Thank you, again, for your interest in the work of our committee!

. . . . . . Ken

At 2018-03-09 14:22 +0000, Jeroen Jochems | Temper wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since recently the dutch tax authorities allow 
> multiple suppliers to combine their invoices in in one document.
>
> (see article 3.2.3.1 at 
> https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/stcrt-2017-59187.pdf)
>
> Am I correct this currently is not a possibility using UBL?
>
> It could easily be achieved by allowing multiple 
> elements (e.g. <Invoice>Â  to be combined in one 
> root element, for example <InvoiceCollective>.
>
> I like your thoughts on how to solve this.
>
> Best,
> Jeroen


--
Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/m/ |
Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources |
Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @ US$45 (5 hours free) |