[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-comment] In the PostAwardProcess object
|
Thank you, David. Iâve included your comment and the TC will respond formally after the public review has ended. There might be a logical explanation to this though I agree that this looks odd. I am not exactly sure why the indicator is 0..n. In all cases, the entire PostAwardProcess ABIE was added to UBL 2.2 so we wonât be able to change the cardinality
in 2.3. Best regards, Kenneth From: David Goodenough <david.goodenough@broadwellmanor.co.uk> which is found in the AwardedNotification why is the ElectronicPaymentUseageIndicator 0...n rather than 0...1? And what would it mean if there were more than one? Is this a historical anomaly, and does anyone seriously expect anyone to use n > 1? |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]