Re: [ubl-csc] Setting up the subcommittee portal for the public

[Jon Bosak <Jon.Bosak@sun.com>]

I meant 8 a.m. Thursday.  Sorry I wasn't clearer.

Jon

   Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 17:16:40 -0700 (PDT)
   From: Jon Bosak <Jon.Bosak@sun.com>

   UBL Chairs,

   Thursday morning (California time) has just opened up for me.  Is
   this a good time to hold a Kavi tech meeting?  If not, I suggest
   we try for next week.

   Jon

      Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 08:43:42 -0800 (PST)
      From: Jon Bosak <Jon.Bosak@sun.com>
      CC: ubl-csc@lists.oasis-open.org

      Hello Marion,

      We're trying to figure out a time for the UBL chairs to meet next
      week for a technical discussion with OASIS regarding the new Kavi
      system.  The only time that seems to work conflicts directly with
      the QA team call.  Tim has suggested that we might push back the
      QA meeting an hour and meet 8-9 a.m. California time.  Is this
      something the group would be willing to do?

      Jon

	 Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 11:54:14 +0800
	 From: Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>
	 CC: gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com, ubl-csc@lists.oasis-open.org

	 not wanting to be a spoiler, but why not move the QA meeting back an 
	 hour? and have it follow our call.

	 Jon Bosak wrote:

	 >It's been pointed out to me that the time I suggested for a CSC
	 >meeting (8 a.m. California time 11 April) is when the QA team
	 >meets.  Sorry!
	 >
	 >It appears that *most* of you can make a CSC call right after the
	 >QA team meeting, i.e. at 10 a.m. California time 11 April.  This
	 >will be 17h00 in London (which is OK with Sue) but 01h00 in Perth
	 >(groan).  I think that Tim has to be in on this.  I can't do a
	 >call 8-10 a.m. Thursday, unfortunately.  Other possibilities are:
	 >
	 >   9 a.m. Mon  7 April (right after the Liaison SC meeting)
	 >   7 a.m. Thu 10 April
	 >   7 a.m. Fri 11 April
	 >
	 >Jon