[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-csc] Outcomes of coordination call 12 December 2003
Thanks, Sue. I thought there was some business remaining here. I'll fix the summary. Jon From: "Sue Probert" <sue.probert@dial.pipex.com> Cc: <ubl-csc@lists.oasis-open.org> Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 08:29:57 -0000 Hi Jon Many thanks for such comprehensive notes of yesterday's meeting. I do have one comment and that is that I do not remember the following statement being made ... 2003-1212-05 Achieving final CCTS alignment Issue I thought that there were issues to be dealt with here. Outcomes (2003.12.12) ..... - We don't need CCTS datatypes, so this is not currently even an LCSC issue. If it becomes one, our NDRs already cover how to deal with it. ..... I cannot agree that this is a permanent decision although I recognise that this is an LCSC issue for me to pursue. LCSC agreed in SFO to take this position for beta but that it would be reviewed as part of the CCTS alignment task. My suggestion would be to change the text as follows: -The beta version does not use any UBL defined CCTS datatypes, so this is not yet even an LCSC issue. However, this has been identified as a key area for CCTS alignment and in SFO LCSC agreed to review this issue. It is hoped that whatever the outcome, our NDRs already cover how to deal with it. regards Sue
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]