Réf. : RE: UML meta-modeling of UN/CEFACT Core Components

["Bruno TRAVERSON" <bruno.traverson@edf.fr>]

MCRAWFORD@lmi.org on 04/08/2004 18:01:31

Pour : Bruno TRAVERSON/IMA/DER/EDFGDF/FR@EDFGDF,
       ubl-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, jon.bosak@sun.com
cc :
Objet :     RE: UML meta-modeling of UN/CEFACT Core Components


Bruno,

Please cite exactly where in ccts a dictionary entry name is not
required for a BBIE.

***
*** sorry it was not the good example;-(
***
*** but, if we consider a BBIE:
***
*** - according to ccts 2.01, it has 5 attributes inherited from
RegistryClass:
***     o UniqueIdentifier [1]
***     o DictionaryEntryName [1]
***     o Definition [1]
***     o Version [1]
***     o UsageRule [0..*]
***   and 3 attributes inherited from BIE:
***     o BusinessTerm [0..*]
***     o ConstraintLanguage [0..*]
***     o Example [0..*]
***
*** - according UBL 1.0 (extract from CoreComponentsParameters.xsd), it has
8 attributes:
***     o DictionaryEntryName [1]
***     o QualifierObjectClassTerm [0..1]
***     o ObjectClassTerm [0..1]
***     o QualifierPropertyTerm [0..1]
***     o PropertyTerm [1]
***     o RepresentationTerm [1]
***     o BusinessTerm [0..1]
***     o Definition [1]
***
*** it is perhaps a misinterpretation of one of the two specifications (or
both!), but
*** it seems to me that the specifications are aligned only on
DictionaryEntryName (too bad!)
*** and Definition attributes...
***
*** sorry again for the confusion.
***
*** Regards,
*** Bruno