Re: [ubl-dev] Major namespace value structural change for a UBL 1.0-cd2?

[David RR Webber <david@drrw.info>]

Jon,

Note - the OASIS Registry team is reviewing their namespace strings.

The concensus is that simpler and shorter is better.

You may want to check with Farrukh or Matt Mackenzie on what they've
ended up with - their samples looked much cleaner and easier to grok.

Thanks, DW
=====================================================================
Quoting jon.bosak@sun.com:

> [cheekai@softml.net:]
> 
> | The namespace value for CommonAggregateComponents schema
> | in UBL 1.0-cd (May 2004) is:
> | 
> | "urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:CommonAggregateComponents:1:0"
> | 
> | But for the UBL 1.0-cd (version 2), it has become:
> | 
> |
> "urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CommonAggregateComponents-1.0"
> 
> | 
> | The change in namespace value structure seems to me very drastic
> | for a rather "tame" version upgrade from 1.0-cd to 1.0-cd2.
> 
> Mark Crawford has already responded to this point in detail, but I
> just wanted to emphasize that we would not have touched this if we
> hadn't become aware that the form used in CD1 was in direct
> conflict with RFC 3121 (we were missing the two fields now
> occupied by "schema:xsd").  So we had no choice about making a
> significant change here.
> 
> Jon
> 
> 


http://drrw.net