Re: [ubl-dev] Major namespace value structural change for a UBL 1.0-cd2?

[David RR Webber <david@drrw.info>]

Jon,

I've not looked at this in detail.  I assume what Farrukh and Matt were
proposing was within the guidelines required.

Thanks, DW

Quoting jon.bosak@sun.com:

> [david@drrw.info:]
> 
> | Note - the OASIS Registry team is reviewing their namespace strings.
> | 
> | The concensus is that simpler and shorter is better.
> 
> Few would argue with that.  But if something doesn't conform to
> RFC 3121, it's not an OASIS URN.
> 
> Jon
> 


http://drrw.net