[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-dev] SBS and Restricted Data Types
Hi Stephen, Could you give an example of how to use the xpath-files when actually validating the document instance? Is it possible to validate that the sender follows the subset and make sure that he sends only what we have agreed upon (and no more). Regards Martin Forsberg -----Original Message----- From: stephen.green@systml.co.uk [mailto:stephen.green@systml.co.uk] Sent: den 3 maj 2006 10:27 To: ubl-dev@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [ubl-dev] SBS and Restricted Data Types Hi Joe For example, in the ...-XPath.xml subset definition file you would have <Element name="Note" type="NoteType" prefix="cbc" uri="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CommonBasicComponents- 1.0" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1" text=""> <Attribute name="languageID" use="optional" type="xsd:language"/> </Element> which could be restricted to <Element name="Note" type="NoteType" prefix="cbc" uri="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CommonBasicComponents- 1.0" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" text=""> <Attribute name="languageID" use="optional" type="xsd:language"/> </Element> making the Note mandatory. This way the SBS mechanism allows restrictions to cardinalities. A reminder that the resulting instances have to be valid according to non-subset schemas too (in the SBS methodology) so only restrictions and not extensions are likely to work. For facets we decided not to create a mechanism for the committee spec definitions which would restrict string content - this is to avoid interoperability problems. If you are in a position to make use of facet restriction of strings, say with patterns, beyond just restricting cardinality, I'd suggest adapting the subset definition to this in a way which agrees with your business partners but this is at your own discretion and outside of scope for the SBS methodology (at present). If you wanted, you could perhaps join the TC to get your method made public to help adoption and interoperability. In the meantime how about an attribute added here minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" text="" restriction-pattern="..."> I say 'restriction-pattern' because it has to obey XSD rules to still be valid for XSD - the resulting string, say, has to be schema valid in the document instance. This would need an extension to the subset definition schemas (XSD and RNG). How does this answer things? I'd consider whether allowing restrictions as much as this doesn't create problems but it does make sense for implementers' own subsets so maybe UBL's SBSC should consider it as a specified extansion. As for how to create susbets in practical terms, along the SBS lines, there are a few things to consider + how to model the subset (the Small Business SC simply pruned UBL + schemas) how to generate subset definitions (SBSC used scripting) the + need to create one's own uuid for each definition how to publish (SBSC + was created to create the definitions as UBL committee specifications and premanently publish them as such in http://docs.oasis-open.org/ubl/ for widest use and interoperablility) + how to associate the subset definitions (and maybe codelist files, + etc) with the business process definitions and trading partner agreements (the SBS methodology only provides a mechanism for doing this with ebXML) A further point is that restrictions of enumeration values are a special case. Say you wanted to restrict a code - there is the Codelist Methodology for that (in progress for UBL in general but version 0.3 is for UBL 1.0). If you wanted to restrict an Identifier to add enumerations (as well one might for an implementation, for example with a tax type ID) then I hope the same codelist methodology could be used, perhaps creating one's own genericode files for the identifiers and codelist association files to relate them to the individual instances (document contexts) of the IDs in the documents. All this relies somewhat on one's being in a position to create one's own subset definitions, codelist genericode files and association files and to associate them with the actual transaction arrangements and publish them. The SBS especially provides all this somewhat to aid interoperability as widely as possible and also to aid adoption where the above said position is limited. All the best Stephen Green Quoting Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>: > Please pardon me if this question has been asked before on this list > (my searches indicated the contrary): > > In terms of the SBS, what is the best way (if any) to restrict data > types of a UBL schema for an specific implementation? Whether it is a > 1.0 or 2.0 schema does not matter for purposes of this question (at > least I don't believe so). > > For example, what if one had a need to define an xsd:minOccurs or > xsd:maxOccurs facet for an xsd:string data type, for their own > implementation? > > Thanks, > Joe > > Joseph Chiusano > Associate > Booz Allen Hamilton > > 700 13th St. NW, Suite 1100 > Washington, DC 20005 > O: 202-508-6514 > C: 202-251-0731 > Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com > <blocked::http://www.boozallen.com/> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- This publicly archived list supports open discussion on implementing the UBL OASIS Standard. To minimize spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting. [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ Alternately, using email: list-[un]subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org List archives: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-dev/ Committee homepage: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl/ List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php Join OASIS: http://www.oasis-open.org/join/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]