[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-dev] SBS and Restricted Data Types
Ken, sorry not to have read your posting before writing mine on the last question. One other thing though: How would you reckon the feasibility of logically validating that a subset which includes pattern restrictions of strings is a true strict subset of a schema? Is it a step too far for now? If so I'd propose that adding pattern restrictions might best be kept to specific agreements or individual software implementations rather than including such in a standardisation effort such as the SBS. A note to all: it seems prudent to only work within the confines of what is so readily determinable as to allow accurate state synchronisation across transactions. This would be limited in each situation by software capabilities on both sides of the transaction For standards efforts and/or open trading scenarios a sensible common denominator (perhaps lowest common denominator as aimed at with the SBS) has to be assumed. This suggests use of Schematron and XSD schema as a means to guauge what is feasible. Thanks Steve
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]