RE: [ubl-dev] Two new documents re: UBL Methodology for Code List and Value Validation

["David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info>]

Ken, 

OK understood! 

At some point this week I'll find time to test everything again.  I have a nasty suspicion some of those "UTF-8" codes in the CEFACT/ISO originals are actually Windows ISO codes - and setting UTF-8 causes character code problems... but I'll need to re-test it all.  I tripped across this before because the CAM editor puts in the UTF-8 header by default if you do not specify one - and so it errored out on including some of the lookup codelist values...

Details, details.... hopefully with the changes you made this is now resolved - but always good to make sure! 

Thanks, DW 

"The way to be is to do" - Confucius (551-472 B.C.)
 

 -------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [ubl-dev] Two new documents re: UBL Methodology for Code 
List and Value  Validation
From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
Date: Tue, April 24, 2007 10:43 am
To: UBL-Dev <ubl-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>

At 2007-04-24 07:00 -0700, David RR Webber \(XML\) wrote:
 >Good work - this is always a task to ensure everything is consistent.
 >
 >I noticed this little innocuous line ; -)
 >
 > - use of UTF-8 encoding for all XML artefacts
 >
 >Which way did you go on country names? Some had accented characters 
 >- are those now just plain characters?
 
 I didn't change the repertoire of characters, David, only the encoding.