[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-dev] Two new documents re: UBL Methodology for Code List and Value Validation
Ken, OK understood! At some point this week I'll find time to test everything again. I have a nasty suspicion some of those "UTF-8" codes in the CEFACT/ISO originals are actually Windows ISO codes - and setting UTF-8 causes character code problems... but I'll need to re-test it all. I tripped across this before because the CAM editor puts in the UTF-8 header by default if you do not specify one - and so it errored out on including some of the lookup codelist values... Details, details.... hopefully with the changes you made this is now resolved - but always good to make sure! Thanks, DW "The way to be is to do" - Confucius (551-472 B.C.) -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: [ubl-dev] Two new documents re: UBL Methodology for Code List and Value Validation From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> Date: Tue, April 24, 2007 10:43 am To: UBL-Dev <ubl-dev@lists.oasis-open.org> At 2007-04-24 07:00 -0700, David RR Webber \(XML\) wrote: >Good work - this is always a task to ensure everything is consistent. > >I noticed this little innocuous line ; -) > > - use of UTF-8 encoding for all XML artefacts > >Which way did you go on country names? Some had accented characters >- are those now just plain characters? I didn't change the repertoire of characters, David, only the encoding.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]