[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-dev] Aggregate components: XML complexType and type= vs.ref=
Short answers: Michael Strasser wrote: > Can someone please explain the decision-making process for UBL If you literally mean the OASIS technical committee process, see http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php If you mean the thinking that went into the UBL design, that's documented in mind-numbing detail in the TC archives starting around the beginning of 2002: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/ > and how it was decided to apparently contradict the UN/CEFACT > rules? The UN/CEFACT rules came after the UBL rules. So you will have to ask UN/CEFACT why they chose a different design. > Or are the "rules" not so clear-cut? I have read the UBL 2.0 NDR > and I am even more confused (i.e. doesn't [RED2] contradict > [ELD3]?)! No, it doesn't. ELD3 applies to all of the elements, whereas by RED2 only the document ABIE is in the document schema and all the others are in the common library. BTW, the UBL NDR editors have just finished up two years of polishing the NDR document and will be submitting it for a second public review shortly. I'll make sure that a notice gets posted here when it's available for review. Jon
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]