[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: ebCore Party Id Type specification
Hello,
Following up on the email below from July last year, the
OASIS ebCore TC has produced a OASIS ebCore Party Id Type
Technical Specification Version 1.0 which is currently in
public review.
Abstract:
"A mechanism for the identification of business partners in
XML business documents and XML message headers based on
URN-based identifier types is required in many electronic
business exchanges. This specification specifies a formal
URN-based mechanism for referencing party types from the ISO
6523, ISO 9735 and ISO 20022 identification scheme catalogs
using the oasis URN namespace. Sample applications include
(but are not limited to): ebXML message headers; ebXML
collaboration protocol profiles and agreements; UBL,
UN/CEFACT and OAGIS XML business documents; and the
UN/CEFACT SBDH."
Editable Source:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ebcore/PartyIdType/v1.0/CD02/Part
yIdType-1.0.odt
PDF:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ebcore/PartyIdType/v1.0/CD02/Part
yIdType-1.0.pdf
HTML:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ebcore/PartyIdType/v1.0/CD02/Part
yIdType-1.0.html
For information on how to submit comments to the TC, see:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/members/201004/msg00008
.html
Pim
-----Original Message-----
From: Pim van der Eijk [mailto:lists@sonnenglanz.net]
Sent: 05 July 2009 14:35
To: 'G. Ken Holman'; ubl-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: adrian@mueller-consulting.biz
Subject: RE: [ubl-dev] UBL Order
Hello,
For the schemeUri attribute, it may be useful to reuse a
proposal that will be incorporated in the next ebXML CPA
specification (but which has no dependency on ebXML), and
that is mentioned in:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-cppa/200704/msg00
002.html
If you follow this approach, the relevant UBL snippet would
look like:
<cbc:ID
schemeURI="urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-cppa:partyid-type:iso652
3:0060">12345</c
bc:ID>
The advantage of this is that the URI schema allows any ISO
6523 approved classification system to be used.
For a list of ICDs, see:
http://metadata-stds.org/Document-library/Draft-standards/65
23-Identificatio
n-of-Organizations/ICD_list.htm#ICD0009
The codes "0002", "0084", "0085", "0087", "0089", "0094",
"0096", "0105", "0106", "0107", "0108" reference Chamber of
Commerce identifiers from France, Greece, Switzerland,
Belgium, UK, Germany, Denmark, Portugal, the Netherlands,
Sweden, Australia, respectively.
Replacing "0060" by "0088" would reference a GS1 Global
Location Number
(GLN) instead of a DUNS number.
The CEN workshop on Cyber Identities has a discussion of all
these concepts in a recent CWA:
ftp://cenftp1.cenorm.be/PUBLIC/CWAs/e-Europe/Cyber_ID/CWA_CI
D_v1.8.pdf
This document is open for comments according to
http://www.cen.eu/cenorm/businessdomains/businessdomains/iss
s/activity/ws_cy
berid.asp. It states they are going to register a
"urn:iso6523" prefix, which would allow the above to be
expressed more compactly as:
<cbc:ID schemeURI="urn:iso6523:0060">12345</cbc:ID>
Pim van der Eijk
-----Original Message-----
From: G. Ken Holman [mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com]
Sent: 03 July 2009 17:15
To: ubl-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ubl-dev] UBL Order
At 2009-07-02 09:32 -0400, Marzka, Jeremy wrote:
>I am currently working on mapping trading partner order
requests to a
>UBL order and have a couple questions.
All questions are very welcome, Jeremy. I hope UBL-Dev
participants do not hold back.
Different volunteers have different perspectives on UBL and
can help in different areas. I cannot help you much on the
business side, but I have a comment below regarding
identifiers.
>Where would you recommend that I map the following?
>1. FOB code and description (FOB Origin, FOB
Destination...) 2. Ship
>Method (Air Freight, Motor Freight, Customer Pickup...) 3.
Carrier Code
>(FedEx Priority, UPS 3-Day, UPS Ground...)
>
>I also am confused by the different parties. Am I correct
in assuming
>that I can map the following?
>
>Sold To -> Buyer Customer Party
>Bill To -> Accounting Customer Party
>Ship To -> Delivery
I see that Roberto has answered the above questions
regarding business entities.
>Our trading partners pass us a DUNS number (Dun &
Bradstreet) that
>uniquely identifies them. Where should I map this? To the
Buyer
>Customer Party -> Party > Party Identification > ID?
Yes, I would have used that, and I see Roberto endorses it
as a general method of identification.
But I wanted to say it would help to identify the
identification method since many identification methods
might produce similar identifiers. I think perhaps
something like the following would be unambiguous and
acceptable:
<cac:BusyerCustomerParty>
<cac:Party>
<cac:PartyIdentification>
<cbc:ID
schemeURI="http://www.dnb.com/US/duns_update/";>12345</cbc:ID
>
</cac:PartyIdentification>
...
>Sorry if these questions are unclear I am relatively new to
this.
Thank you for asking them!
. . . . . . . . . . . Ken
--
Possible July/August XSLT/XQuery/XSL-FO training in
Oakland/CA/USA
Crane Softwrights Ltd.
http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/u/
Training tools: Comprehensive interactive XSLT/XPath 1.0/2.0
video
Video lesson:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrNjJCh7Ppg&fmt=18
Video overview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTiodiij6gE&fmt=18
G. Ken Holman
mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07
http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/u/bc
Legal business disclaimers:
http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
ubl-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
ubl-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
ubl-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
ubl-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]