OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl-dev message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [ubl-dev] A Subset for UBL 2.1 (like UBL Small Business Subset)


Thanks Tim
 
I think another way to do it would be to form a Conformance TC
and make an SBS just one kind of 'conformance profile'[1] they
could consider for UBL. Then the SBS culd just be the basis of
one of potentially several UBL 'conformance profiles', perhaps
feeding into test beds, etc.
 
[1] - I guess by 'conformance profile' I mean a fairly lightweight
spec as external to the UBL spec (perhaps like the ebXML
profiles which are published from time to time) where the heavy
lifting is done in comprehensive conformance clauses (perhaps
more complex than the blanket UBL clause - perhaps a clause
for senders, another for receivers and another for the document).
----
Stephen D Green



On 26 July 2011 02:09, Tim McGrath <tim.mcgrath@documentengineeringservices.com> wrote:
your timing is incredible.  i have also been considering the fact that we now have several years implementation experience and it would be worthwhile to revisit this concept.  others have also suggested ideas for this and it seems we may be able to provide something alongside the 2.1 release.

do you think we should revive the SBS TC for this?




On 26/07/11 3:51 AM, Stephen D Green wrote:
Just as public review is due to start for UBL, I've
spent a few hours revisiting the subset work I did
starting with the UBL Small Business Subset and
updating it for UBL 2.1. (Maybe it can be developed
into a 2.1 SBS.)
 
I have put the attached together as a possible 2.1
subset similar to the UBL Small Business Subset
but supporting the digital signatures in UBL 2.1.
I hope the mail servers let me to do this. Apologies
if they do not.
 
Maybe folk will find it useful, although it is not a
comprehensive, thorough work like the BII and OIO
subsets. It represents my own understanding of what
I think is a compromise between minimalism and
practicality but I cannot claim a live implementation.
 
Is there still any scope for making the external subset
project outputs more integral to future UBL versions?
----
Stephen D Green

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ubl-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: ubl-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ubl-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ubl-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]