[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-dev] Invoice DueDate: which element?
Steve, Go to part 1 (Profile overview)
You are now on: http://spec.cenbii.eu/Profiles/IndexWG1.html Then click on [Guidelines] You are now on: http://spec.cenbii.eu/Profiles/Guidelines.html And there you can see all CEN BII guidelines. Kees Van: stephengreenubl@gmail.com [mailto:stephengreenubl@gmail.com]
Namens Stephen D Green Hi Peter, Just one other question: You pointed to a very useful web page:
http://spec.cenbii.eu/Profiles/Guidelines/BII%20Guideline%2007%20-%20Payment%20means%20v1.pdf
How would you navigate to that page, say from the top page of the site http://spec.cenbii.eu/ (if you wanted to see such information for the other entities)? Many thanks
On 20 April 2012 07:36, Stephen D Green <stephen.green@documentengineeringservices.com> wrote: Wonderful news. Thanks Peter Steve
On 19 April 2012 20:57, Peter L. Borresen <plb@ebconnect.dk> wrote: Hi Stephen CENBII is finished and used in the PEPPOL and the Norvegian legislation, see
http://vefa.difi.no/formatvisning/faktura/011.htm However CENBII2 is reviewing the work and may come up with changes (in particular for
the tendering part), but that will be in a new workshop agreement (like a new version). I am not involved in CENBII2 and do not know the details. Best regards Peter Fra: Stephen
D Green [mailto:stephengreenubl@gmail.com]
Hi Peter I'm glad to see there is a lot completed now on the CEN BII site
http://spec.cenbii.eu/Index.html What is the status of BII now? Is there a kind of standardisation process for CEN projects like this? If so what stage is it at presently (so people know, if and when they want to use it in implementations)? Thanks Steve ---- Stephen D Green On 19 April 2012 14:50, Peter L. Borresen <plb@ebconnect.dk> wrote: Hi Roland I can recommend
http://spec.cenbii.eu/Profiles/Guidelines/BII%20Guideline%2007%20-%20Payment%20means%20v1.pdf
(even when this is a customization) and http://www.oioubl.info/guidelines/en/OIOUBL_GUIDE_PAYMENT.pdf In the first one you get the following example for a payment: <cac:PaymentMeans>
<cbc:PaymentMeansCode>31</cbc:PaymentMeansCode>
<cbc:PaymentDueDate>2007-01-01</cbc:PaymentDueDate>
<cbc:PaymentChannelCode>IBAN</cbc:PaymentChannelCode>
<cbc:InstructionID>A12345</cbc:InstructionID>
<cac:PayeeFinancialAccount>
<cac:FinancialInstitutionBranch>
<cac:FinancialInstitution>
<cbc:ID>SEISISRE</cbc:ID>
<cbc:Name>Central bank of Iceland</cbc:Name>
<cac:FinancialInstitution>
</cac:FinancialInstitutionBranch>
</cac:PayeeFinancialAccount>
</cac:PaymentMeans> Best regards Peter L. Borresen Fra: Kenneth
Bengtsson [mailto:kenneth@alfa1lab.com]
cac:PaymentMeans / cbc:PaymentDueDate ? From:
Roland Hommes - Rhocon <roland@rhocon.nl> Hi, I am confused which element to use for the due date of the invoice. The date before
which payment MUST be received. I can see two options: Cac:PaymentTerms/cac:PenaltyPeriod/cbc:StartDate Cac:PaymentTerms/cac:SettlementPeriod/cbc:EndDate The first because the expiry of the due date can be seen as the start of the penalty
period. The second because the due date can be seen as the date in which the ‘grace period’ expires.
Which one is the correct one? Or maybe something completely different? Thanks, Roland Hommes On behalf of the Dutch Electronic Purchasing and Invoicing Project Ingen virus fundet i denne meddelelse. Ingen virus fundet i denne meddelelse. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]