Re: [ubl-dev] Mapping from Genericode <Identification> tags to UBL Code attributes?

[David Goodenough <david.goodenough@broadwellmanor.co.uk>]

I could run with that, but the SchemeURI is one of the attributes with no obvious mapping in the Genericode.

 

David

 

On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 12:10:09 BST Steve Capell wrote:

> My personal view (which will no doubt trigger some objections) that they are

> all redundant except a schemeURI which uniquely tells you everything you

> need about the code list issuer, list id, version, etc...

>

>

> Steven Capell

> Mob: 0410 437854

>

> > On 23 May 2018, at 8:00 pm, David Goodenough

> > <david.goodenough@broadwellmanor.co.uk> wrote:

> >

> > Is there a document anywhere that maps the items in the Genericode

> > <Identification> section to the UBL Code attributes.

> >

> > The UBL code attributes being:-

> >

> > ListId,ListAgencyId,ListAgencyName,ListName,ListVersionId,Name,LanguageId,

> > ListURI,ListSchemaURI

> >

> > and the Genericode tags being:-

> >

> > ShortName, LongName (two form, second being ListId), Version,

> > CanonicalUri, CanonicalVersionURI, LocationUri,

> > AlternativeFormatLocationUrl, Agency (LongName and Identifier).

> >

> > My assumption would be:-

> >

> > UBL Genericode

> > === =======

> > ListId LongName/@Identifier="listID"

> > ListAgencyId Agency/Identifier

> > ListAgencyName Agency/LongName

> > ListName LongName (not listId version)

> > ListVersionId ?? Does not seem to be encoded in Genericode

> > Name ShortName

> > LanguageId ?? I guess this come from one of the two xml:lang

> > attributes, ?? what if they are different ListURI LocationUri

> > ListSchemaURI ?? Is this the gc:CodeList/@xmlns:gc value ??

> >

> > Was a formal mapping done when UBL moved to using Genericode?

> >

> > Also putting all of these values into every code in a UBL document seems

> > rather redundant, is it considered valid to put just the ListId (possibly

> > also the AgencyID to ensure uniqueness) in the subsequent instances of

> > the same code list?

> >

> > David