Hi David,
it is an implementation dependent information,
it could be either the party that first sent its DigitalCapability or simply the DigitalAgreement *sender*.
I would prefere the 2nd because this particular document does not have fixed Sender and Receiver parties. Especially in the multi-lateral agreement the sender shoudl be the initiator.
Hope this helps,
Roberto
Il 26/06/2018 12:38, David Goodenough ha scritto:
it is an implementation dependent information,
it could be either the party that first sent its DigitalCapability or simply the DigitalAgreement *sender*.
I would prefere the 2nd because this particular document does not have fixed Sender and Receiver parties. Especially in the multi-lateral agreement the sender shoudl be the initiator.
Hope this helps,
Roberto
Il 26/06/2018 12:38, David Goodenough ha scritto:
in a DigitalAgreement there is an InitiatingPartyIndicator.
Is this the party who sent the DigitalCapability in response to which the DigitalAgreements were exchanged, or is the the party who received the DigitalCapabilities and sent back the first DigitalAgreement?
I had assumed it was the one who sent the DigitalCapability, but then a nagging doubt arose in my mind that it might be the first DigitalAgreement sender because in the example it is Vendor who is has InitiatingPartyIndicator=true, not Buyer. But in the multi-lateral example neither has the indicator.
David
--
Best regards
Best regards
 |
Roberto
Cisternino
e-Business Consultant, JAVEST by Roberto Cisternino OASIS Member | UBL ITLSC, Chair | P.IVA IT01290640117 | C.F. CSTRRT68M06E463H | roberto.cisternino@javest.com | http://www.javest.com | Mobile: +39 328 2148123 | Skype: roberto.cisternino.ubl-itlsc | Via Europa 33/F 19020 Follo, La Spezia, Italy |