OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl-dev message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ubl-dev] FW: Urgent clarification regarding enveloped signature


Hi Andrea!

Thank you for your really fast answer, that was really helpful.

I sent a thank you email before but, for some reason, I got several bad delivery feedbacks (just got another one).

Your quick answer was very appreciated and I want to make sure you know it.

Best regards

Pedro Fernandes
Direção de Sistemas de Informação

AdP Servicos

Rua Visconde de Seabra 3 | 1700-421 Lisboa | Tel: 212 469 549 (10549) | Fax: 212 469 541 | http://www.adp.pt

 

Tenha uma EcoAtitude. Imprima este e-mail apenas se necessário.
Esta mensagem e os ficheiros anexos podem conter informação confidencial ou reservada. Se, por engano, receber esta mensagem, solicita-se que informe de imediato o remetente e que elimine a mensagem e ficheiros anexos sem os reproduzir.
This message and any files herewith attached may contain confidential or privileged information. If you receive this message in error, please notify us immediately and delete this message and any files attached without copying them in any way.

 

--- Begin Message ---

Hi Andrea!

Thank you very much!

I was afraid I was misunderstanding, thank you for the confirmation.

I will correct may work accordingly.

Best regards

Pedro Fernandes
DireÃÃo de Sistemas de InformaÃÃo

AdP Servicos

Rua Visconde de Seabra 3 | 1700-421 Lisboa | Tel: 212 469 549 (10549) | Fax: 212 469 541 | http://www.adp.pt

cid:image002.png@01D51AB7.9F2DBD90 

Tenha uma EcoAtitude. Imprima este e-mail apenas se necessÃrio.
Esta mensagem e os ficheiros anexos podem conter informaÃÃo confidencial ou reservada. Se, por engano, receber esta mensagem, solicita-se que informe de imediato o remetente e que elimine a mensagem e ficheiros anexos sem os reproduzir.
This message and any files herewith attached may contain confidential or privileged information. If you receive this message in error, please notify us immediately and delete this message and any files attached without copying them in any way.

 

From: Andrea Caccia [mailto:andrea.caccia@studiocaccia.com]
Sent: 4 de junho de 2019 00:15
To: ubl-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ubl-dev] FW: Urgent clarification regarding enveloped signature

 

Hi Pedro,

I think you are right, in the UBL-Invoice-2.0-Enveloped.xml if I look at this fragment:

 

  <ext:UBLExtension xmlns:sig="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CommonSignatureComponents-2" xmlns:sac="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:SignatureAggregateComponents-2" xmlns:sbc="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:SignatureBasicComponents-2">

    <ext:ExtensionContent>

      <sig:UBLDocumentSignatures>

<sac:SignatureInformation>

<ds:Signature xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#" Id="addedSig">

 

the element:

 <ext:ExtensionURI>urn:âoasis:ânames:âspecification:âubl:âdsig:âenveloped:âxades</ext:ExtensionURI>

is missing between <ext:UBLExtension> and <ext:ExtensionContent>

 

So as you already have found the text in 5.3.4.4 and 5.3.4.8 is indeed correct, in 5.4 the UBL-Invoice-2.0-Enveloped.xml must be corrected and in 6.2 in "...the <ext:Extension> element is present in the UBL extension..." must be changed to "...the <ext:ExtensionURI> element is present in the UBL extension..."

 

Did I get all your points?

 

Thanks,

Andrea Caccia

 

Il giorno 3 giu 2019, alle ore 19:38, Pedro Fernandes <pedro.fernandes@ADP.PT> ha scritto:

 

Just realized I made a mistake Reading.

In chapter 5.3.4.4 The Signature Information itâs used an example without <ext:ExtensionURI>.

In chapter 5.3.4.8 A Signature Skeleton itâs used another example without <ext:ExtensionURI>.

Of course <ext:ExtensionURI> itâs not used because only <ext:ExtensionContent> is the shown.

Iâm sorry about this mistake the other doubts remain.

Pedro Fernandes
DireÃÃo de Sistemas de InformaÃÃo

<image001.png>

Rua Visconde de Seabra 3 | 1700-421 Lisboa | Tel: 212 469 549 (10549) | Fax: 212 469 541 | http://www.adp.pt

Tenha uma EcoAtitude. Imprima este e-mail apenas se necessÃrio.
Esta mensagem e os ficheiros anexos podem conter informaÃÃo confidencial ou reservada. Se, por engano, receber esta mensagem, solicita-se que informe de imediato o remetente e que elimine a mensagem e ficheiros anexos sem os reproduzir.
This message and any files herewith attached may contain confidential or privileged information. If you receive this message in error, please notify us immediately and delete this message and any files attached without copying them in any way.

 

From: Pedro Fernandes 
Sent: 3 de junho de 2019 18:21
To: ubl-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Urgent clarification regarding enveloped signature

 

Hi all!

I was Reading documentation regarding digital signature in this link http://docs.oasis-open.org/ubl/os-UBL-2.1/UBL-2.1.html#S-UBL-DIGITAL-SIGNATURES

In chapter 5.3.4.1 The Extension Metadata it seems element <ext:ExtensionURI> with value âurn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:dsig:envelopedâ is mandatory.

In chapter 5.3.4.4 The Signature Information itâs used an example without <ext:ExtensionURI>.

In chapter 5.3.4.8 A Signature Skeleton itâs used another example without <ext:ExtensionURI>.

In chapter 5.4 Digital Signature Examples itâs used another example without <ext:ExtensionURI>.

In chapter 6.2 Digital Signature Conformance itâs mentioned that âClaiming syntax conformance to the enveloped signature profile of UBL 2.1 requires (â) the <ext:Extension> element is present in the UBL extension and has either urn:âoasis:ânames:âspecification:âubl:âdsig:âenveloped or urn:âoasis:ânames:âspecification:âubl:âdsig:âenveloped:âxades as its valueâ.

 

My doubts:

If <ext:ExtensionURI> is mandatory, was it forgotten in the examples? Are the examples right?

 

If for conformance reason <ext:Extension> is required to have a value why is it never mentioned? 

Is it a mistake and you really mean that <ext:ExtensionURI> is required to have a value? 

Are you considering that <ext:ExtensionURI> value is <ext:Extension> value?

 

Please accept my apologies if this is just a misunderstanding from my part due to English not being my native language.

Best regards

Pedro Fernandes
DireÃÃo de Sistemas de InformaÃÃo

<image001.png>

Rua Visconde de Seabra 3 | 1700-421 Lisboa | Tel: 212 469 549 (10549) | Fax: 212 469 541 | http://www.adp.pt

Tenha uma EcoAtitude. Imprima este e-mail apenas se necessÃrio.
Esta mensagem e os ficheiros anexos podem conter informaÃÃo confidencial ou reservada. Se, por engano, receber esta mensagem, solicita-se que informe de imediato o remetente e que elimine a mensagem e ficheiros anexos sem os reproduzir.
This message and any files herewith attached may contain confidential or privileged information. If you receive this message in error, please notify us immediately and delete this message and any files attached without copying them in any way.

 


--- End Message ---


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]