OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl-l10n message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [ubl-jplsc] Re: [ubl-l10n] Preparing the UBL 2.0 International Data Dictionary

Dear Jon Bosak,
I understand what you said.
We (UBL JPLSC) would like to start to revise Japanese translation of UBL 
You said followings at your e-mail posted on May 19, 2008
To begin the work of revision, Roberto Cisternino of the ITLSC
will prepare updated versions of your current translations.  These
revised spreadsheets will contain all of the corrections to
Dictionary Entry Names (DENs) and English definitions made in the
Update Package, and they will also highlight the translated
definitions that must be revised by the LSCs.
We will expect the correction version (UBL 2.0 which has highlight to be
revised) will be made and be submitted to us (UBL JPLSC).

I have another question.
What is the exact version number of UBL 2.0 Update Package?
The file name of all of spreadsheets in UBL 2.0 Update Package is "2.0", for 
example: UBL-CommonLibrary-2.0. In case of IDD libraries, there is title in 
the top of spreadsheets. for example: UBL CommonLibrary 2.0.
There is no difference in file names and title of spreadsheets between the 
first UBL 2.0 and UBL 2.0 Update Package. Is this OK? I think this is 
troublesome, because we cannot distinguish the update version spreadsheets 
only by the file name or title of spreadsheets. I think the version number 
of update UBL 2.0 should be changed to distinguish the first UBL 2.0. For 
example, the update UBL 2.0 would change to UBL 2.01.

Best Regards,
Yukinori Saito
Yukinori Saito
ERP Research Corporation
e-mail: y.saito@erp.jp
Tel: +81-3-3432-1656  Fax: +81-3-5405-1302

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <jon.bosak@sun.com>
To: <y.saito@erp.jp>
Cc: <ubl-l10n@lists.oasis-open.org>; <jon.bosak@sun.com>;
<ubl-jplsc@lists.oasis-open.org>; <N.Itoh@otsuka-shokai.co.jp>;
<naitoh@is.oit.ac.jp>; <kueno@iea.att.ne.jp>;
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 3:39 AM
Subject: Re: [ubl-jplsc] Re: [ubl-l10n] Preparing the UBL 2.0 International
Data Dictionary

Hello Saito-san,

My apologies for the delay -- it has taken me some time to catch
up after returning to work.

| (2) Some questions
| (a) Countermeasures to the comments from JPLSC
| As you know, I have submitted our JPLSC's comments regarding UBL
| 2.0 named "Comments to UBL 2.0 by UBL JPLSC" on September 22,
| 2007. I think that the countermeasures or dispositions are not
| done perfectly yet.  I want to revise the JPLSC translation if
| possible, after all countermeasures or dispositions will be
| finished and the revised UBL 2.n will be finished. Because, we
| (JPLSC) want to revise the JPLSC translation at a time.
| Is it possible to revise the JPLSC translation at a time?

All comments from JPLSC were reviewed, and as a result, many
changes were made to the UBL 2.0 definitions.  Those changes were
included in the recently released UBL 2.0 Update Package:


I'm sure I speak for the entire TC in thanking JPLSC for their
work in reviewing UBL 2.0.  The resulting changes have
substantially improved the clarity of a number of the
definitions.  I'm equally sure that further refinements can be
made in this area, but with release of the Update Package, we have
gone as far as we can with UBL 2.0.  Your review of UBL 2.1 will
be very welcome when the first spreadsheets are released later
this year.

Those new spreadsheets will be a focus of the next UBL TC meeting,
which will take place in August.  So these next couple of months
are the time to finish the data dictionary for 2.0.  I will have
more to say about this in another message.


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]