Re: [ubl-lcsc] Revised/'typed' elements we defined last week

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>]

Title: RE: [ubl-lcsc] Revised/'typed' elements we defined last week

As i mentioned, the  library sample i gave you earlier for the Party structure
was not doing the 'typing' correctly.

Thanks to Bill, I know understand (i hope) how this is to work.

Please find attached the revised Party BIE spreadsheet plus a completely
redrawn UML Class diagram

Can Arofan and Gunther co-ordinate to use this data for the XSD sample.

 - i think i am getting the hang of this!

Tim McGrath wrote:

yes, the first task is for Arofan to define the new XSD schema so you can build the program to transform the Party BIEs i sent into this form.

since sending the Party spreadsheet out, i have had a fairly significant mistake pointed out to me by Bill Burcham - so i shall try and fix this and get a newer version to you both  before you do the transformation.


Stuhec, Gunther wrote:

Hello Tim and Arofan,

 

I guess it will be the best way, if Arofan and myself synchronize us during the meeting in Seattle. I'll hope, Arofan made his changes beforehand, so that I can create an new configurationfile for extracting XML-schemas or vice versa.

 

Regards,

    Gunther

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim McGrath [ mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au ]
Sent: Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2002 01:40
To: Gregory, Arofan
Cc: Stuhec, Gunther
Subject: Re: [ubl-lcsc] Revised/'typed' elements we defined last week

thats OK.  the group is kind of working in three parts now....

a. a small team doing the analysis of the common elements (lisa is co-ordinating this)
b. the remainder undertaking the review of these common elements
c. you and Gunther who will be prototyping the analysis results (using the Party BIEs) and producing the XSD.

it would help us a lot if you could get your stuff done by next Tuesday's meeting (Feb 5th at 9:00am).  i realise that you and Gunther may be at the Seattle X12/eBTWG talkfest - but that may help you finish it off anyway.


Gregory, Arofan wrote:

Tim:

Sorry I couldn't make this mornings' call. I will work this up into a sample.

Cheers,

arofan

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim McGrath [ mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au ]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 7:34 PM
To: ubl-lcsc@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ubl-lcsc] Revised/'typed' elements we defined last week

As promised, please find attached a revision of the elements we modeled
last week.  I have edited them for consistency and added the 'types' for
each association of elements (see the 'Contains UBL' column for these).

For those who find it useful i also attach the UML class digram showing
the structure of these elements.  This is basically the same as the
'contains UBL element' information but presented graphically.

This does not replace the combined sheet - it only contains the  20-30
elements AND NOTHING ELSE! - lisa will need to update the master copy
with these rows once we have discussed them on tuesday morning.

--
regards
tim mcgrath
fremantle  western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
fremantle  western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142 

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
fremantle  western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142 

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
fremantle  western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142

UBL_Library_v0.4_Partyrevised version.xls