RE: [ubl-lcsc] Scope Document

["Probert, Sue" <Sue.Probert@commerceone.com>]

Bill

 

I am not sure that this is a US/UK English question. Oxford gives them as valid alternatives for the same thing but admittedly gives dispatch the greater emphasis so I guess you are right. However, in UN/EDIFACT the equivalent message has always been called Despatch Advice or more often DESADV! In my experience the names ASN or Despatch Advice are the commonly used and understood names for this functional document type. Other thoughts?

 

Sue

Sue Probert
Senior Director, Document Standards
Commerce One
Mobile: +44 7798 846652
Tel: +44 1425 275117 or +44 1753 483000
email: sue.probert@commerceone.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Burcham, Bill [mailto:Bill_Burcham@stercomm.com]
Sent: 11 October 2002 19:57
To: Ubl-Lcsc
Subject: RE: [ubl-lcsc] Scope Document

OK, I'll be the big bad amero-centrist here and ask -- shouldn't that be "dispatch" notice as opposed to "despatch" notice?

 

-Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Lisa Seaburg [mailto:xmlgeek@gmi.net]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 1:48 PM
To: Ubl-Lcsc
Subject: [ubl-lcsc] Scope Document

The Scope document is now available on the LC SC webpage at the following link:

 

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl/lcsc/doc/UBLScopeStatements0-01.doc

 

Let me know if there are any problems. 

 

Lisa

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Lisa Seaburg
AEON Consulting
Website: http://shell.gmi.net/~xmlgeek/
Email:  xmlgeek@gmi.net
Alternative Email: xcblgeek@yahoo.com
Phone: 662-562-7676
Cellphone: 662-501-7676

 

"Remember that great love and great achievements involve great risk."
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++