[ubl-lcsc] Re: Comments on combined message Spreadsheet

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>]

Do you think these comments could form part of the review cycle for the 
next release?

PS please use the list for these exchanges.

Michael Adcock wrote:

>Hi!
>
>I have gone through the combined message spreadsheet, and noted a
>number of problems. I believe these should be fixed before any
>distribution. They are relatively small, I'm glad to say, although there
>is one significant issue. That is the loss of 'specialisation' detail
>when an ABIE is used in a limited way.
>
>As an experiment I have taken the combined spreadsheet and
>experimentally added columns to note which messages use which bitsl
>Without this, generating XSD from the Re-use spreadsheet would include
>too much XSD!
>
>Thiis only the tip of the iceberg, as I think we also lose
>opportunities to specialise definitions to say why we are using certain
>things in certain places, and also any change in cardinalities. See my
>general comments: I'd like us to think about this!
>
>Also needing thought is whether to maintain the separate message
>spreadsheets.
>
>Attached are two files; my set of comments, and the experimentally
>annotated 'used in message' version of the Re-Used Components
>spreadsheet. The latter DOES NOT reflect any of ny proposed remedies re
>comments! It would be good if Arofan (or anyone else) could comment on
>whether this is what we see as 'business context'.
>
>'bye for now...
>
>Mike Adcock
>Standards & Security Unit
>APACS - Association for Payment Clearing Services
>Mercury House, Triton Court
>14 Finsbury Square
>London EC2A 1LQ
>Tel: +44 (0) 20 7711 6318
>Fax: +44 (0) 20 7711 6299
>e-mail: michael.adcock@apacs.org.uk
>
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>The opinions expressed are those of the individual and not the company.
>  Internet communications are not secure and therefore APACS does not  
>     accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
>  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
>employee responsible for delivering this communication to the intended
>recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or
>   copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>          telephone to arrange for its return.  Thank you.
>**********************************************************************
>
>  
>

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
fremantle  western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142