OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl-lcsc message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: [ubl-lcsc] [QA Team] Feedback on Methodology Paper

Here is the feedback from Matt on the Methodology paper.  Matt brings up
some interesting thoughts.

I would like to put this on the agenda for the next QA Team Meeting.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Gertner" <matthew.gertner@acepoint.cz>
To: "Lisa-Aeon" <lseaburg@aeon-llc.com>
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 8:54 AM
Subject: QA Feedback


I am attaching a slightly marked up version of Tim's methodology paper.
I made a few editorial changes. In general it was unclear to me who the
intended audience of this document is and what it current stage of
development is. It appeared to me that the entire text is right now only
introduction for some expose to come of the actual UBL methodology. Is
this correct?

I would almost tend to say that the text is too long and not entirely
focused on the problem at hand. It is an interesting and enlightened
discussion of what is meant my document engineering, but do we need this
as a UBL deliverable? Certainly I would personally be more interested in
understanding the exact structure of the LC SC spreadsheet, what fields
mean what, examples of particularly tricky cases and how they are
solved, reasons why a move to a more database-oriented format is felt
necessary, etc.


Attachment: position-mcgrath-methodology-01.doc
Description: MS-Word document

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Powered by eList eXpress LLC