OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl-lcsc message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: Re: [ubl-lcsc] [QA Team] Feedback on Methodology Paper

Another quick win for the QA TEAM.
It appears unlikely that I will be available for the teleconference
tomorrow (Tuesdays are becoming more difficult for me to uphold), but I
would urge all QA team members to attend the teleconference this Friday.
In the meantime, please don't hesitate to call me if I can be of


CALL DATE:           (Friday)
 DURATION:              2 hr

 USA Toll Free Number: 888-889-3251
 USA Toll Number: +1-712-257-2345
  PASSCODE: 77994

Mike, I concur that the last scope document you sent (with updated change
log) reflects the latest version.

Marion A. Royal
202.208.4643 (Office)
202.302.4634 (Mobile)

                    "Tim McGrath"          To:     Lisa-Aeon <lseaburg@aeon-llc.com>                                 
                    <tmcgrath@portco       cc:     "Marion Royal" <marion.royal@gsa.gov>, Ubl-Lcsc                   
                    mm.com.au>              <ubl-lcsc@lists.oasis-open.org>                                          
                                           Subject:     Re: [ubl-lcsc] [QA Team] Feedback on Methodology Paper       
                    01/06/2003 10:39                                                                                 

matt is correct that this is now a redundant paper.  A shorter and more
appropriate version based on our experience  with the latest modeling
exercise will be part of the 0p70 release documents.

Lisa-Aeon wrote:

>Here is the feedback from Matt on the Methodology paper.  Matt brings up
>some interesting thoughts.
>I would like to put this on the agenda for the next QA Team Meeting.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Matthew Gertner" <matthew.gertner@acepoint.cz>
>To: "Lisa-Aeon" <lseaburg@aeon-llc.com>
>Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 8:54 AM
>Subject: QA Feedback
>I am attaching a slightly marked up version of Tim's methodology paper.
>I made a few editorial changes. In general it was unclear to me who the
>intended audience of this document is and what it current stage of
>development is. It appeared to me that the entire text is right now only
>introduction for some expose to come of the actual UBL methodology. Is
>this correct?
>I would almost tend to say that the text is too long and not entirely
>focused on the problem at hand. It is an interesting and enlightened
>discussion of what is meant my document engineering, but do we need this
>as a UBL deliverable? Certainly I would personally be more interested in
>understanding the exact structure of the LC SC spreadsheet, what fields
>mean what, examples of particularly tricky cases and how they are
>solved, reasons why a move to a more database-oriented format is felt
>necessary, etc.

tim mcgrath
fremantle  western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Powered by eList eXpress LLC