Re: [ubl-lcsc] Fw: [QA-0p70] Context Methodology Issue

["CRAWFORD, Mark" <MCRAWFORD@lmi.org>]

Oh boy - agreeing with arofan twice in one day. I see this as more than web services and contet. This is exactly the sorrt of extension of the work effort we want to see as we move into UBL Phase two.
Mark Crawford
Research Fellow - LMI XML Lead
W3C Advisory Committee, OASIS, RosettaNet Representative
Vice Chair - OASIS UBL TC & Chair Naming and Design Rules Subcommittee
Chair - UN/CEFACT XML Syntax Working Group
Editor - UN/CEFACT Core Components
______
Logistics Management Institute
2000 Corporate Ridge, McLean, VA 22102-7805
(703) 917-7177   Fax (703) 917-7481 
Wireless (703) 655-4810
mcrawford@lmi.org
http://www.lmi.org
"Opportunity is what you make of it"


-----Original Message-----
From: A Gregory <agregory@aeon-llc.com>
To: Lisa Seaburg <lseaburg@aeon-llc.com>; Ubl-Lcsc <ubl-lcsc@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Fri Apr 11 15:00:10 2003
Subject: RE: [ubl-lcsc] Fw: [QA-0p70] Context Methodology Issue

Eduardo:

This would seem to be only half web-services standards related; I think the
other half is the type of customization (or perhaps new doctypes) that
people would need for a specific industry.

Cheers,

Arofan

-----Original Message-----
From: Lisa Seaburg [mailto:lseaburg@aeon-llc.com]
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 10:01 AM
To: Ubl-Lcsc
Subject: [ubl-lcsc] Fw: [QA-0p70] Context Methodology Issue



----- Original Message -----
From: "Eduardo Gutentag" <eduardo.gutentag@sun.com>
To: "Lisa Seaburg" <lseaburg@aeon-llc.com>
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: [QA-0p70] Context Methodology Issue


> I have no idea what this means nor what relationship it has with Context
> Methodology. Why is any of this suddenly a web service? I guess we'll have
> to talk about this in London, but my inclination is to say that this has
> nothing to do with the CM SC.
>
> (Please forward this message to LC SC, as it will be rejected if I send
> it directly)
>
> Thanks!
>
> Lisa Seaburg wrote:
> > Eduardo,
> > The following comment came through on the 0p70 Release,  he had said he
> > wanted to support the extension issue and his comment was the following:
> >
> > Comment number: 22.1
> > " Instead of current UBL scope (EDI or EDIFACT specific), as we talked
> > andpromised our comments to you,  we at Convergys would like to see the
> > following type of work (under UBL-T or UBL-C Technical Committee)
> > carried forward. We would be interesting in providing support for such
> > standardization efforts (if approved) - OSS/BSS Business Language
> > Standards (I would call it - UBL-C for Universal Business Language for
> > Communications Industry - that would include):
> >     Object Definition and Interactions for:
> >             - Events (types, field definitions)
> >             - Account (attributes - public, private/custom)
> >             - Subscription (types)
> >             - RateFactor (types, associations)
> >             - Customer (types/profiles)
> >             - Services (types, public/private)
> >       Interface definitions using WSDL
> >       Discovery of Objects/Services via UDDI
> >       Transport mechanism (SOAP over TCP/IP)
> > Hope this helps in your meetings this week. We will follow-up with you
> > in next 10 days. "
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > Lisa Seaburg
> > AEON LLC
> > Website: http://www.aeon-llc.com/
> > Email:  lseaburg@aeon-llc.com <mailto:lseaburg@aeon-llc.com>
> > Alternative Email: xcblgeek@yahoo.com <mailto:xcblgeek@yahoo.com>
> > Phone: 662-562-7676
> > Cellphone: 662-501-7676
> >
> > "Remember that great love and great achievements involve great risk."
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> --
> Eduardo Gutentag               |         e-mail: eduardo.gutentag@Sun.COM
> Web Technologies and Standards |         Phone:  +1 510 550 4616 x31442
> Sun Microsystems Inc.          |         1800 Harrison St. Oakland, CA
94612
> W3C AC Rep / OASIS TAB Chair
>