[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-lcsc] Agenda for the next meeting of the UBL Library Contentsubcommittee to be held on TUESDAY 15th April between 8 and 10a.m Californiatime
20030318-03: Bill & Mike publish sample instance issues. 20030318-06: Mike A. - draft of methodology paper. 20030401-01: QA Team identify issues prior to the f2f. 20030408-01: All - review Gunther's Common Core Components paper before F2F. 20030408-02: Mark send CCTS Implementation Verification information 20030408-03: Marion start discussion for CCTS impl. verification process. 20030408-04: Jon submit CCTS implementation verification form.
20030304-04: Tim to review HL7 comments
20030318-03: Bill & Mike publish list of sample instance issues.
20030318-06: Mike A. get draft of methodology discussion paper out for next meeting.
20030401-01:QA Team identify issues to bring up prior to the face to face.
3. Work Plan for 1p00 release. - Analysis plans for face-to-face (Sue) - Modeling plans for face-to-face (Mike) - QA Team report (Marion) - 0p70 review comments to date (http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/ubl-lcsc/download.php/1535/0p70_comments_20030411.xls) - close of comments period - issues for discussion prior to face-to-face - digitial signature issue? 4. Reporrts from other SCs - Liaison - NDR - Context Methodology - Tools and Techniques 5. CCTS Implementation Verification - Action plan 6. Other Business - change of call details from next week - KIVA issues outstanding - capture action items outstanding
-- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160
-- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160
The UBL Library Content Subcommittee met by phone on Tuesday 18 March 2003.
Meeting Logistics:
Time: 16:00 GMT
Call number: 877.494.5165
International number: 405.319.0674
Participant code: 133929
The agenda will be:
1. Welcome from Chair, roll call, appointment of Secretary to take minutes
2. Acceptance of previous minutes; open action items.
3. Work Plan for 1p00 release.(schedule attached)
- Analysis report (Sue)
- Modeling report (Mike)
- QA Team report (Marion)
- 0p70 review comments to date
4. Other Business
1. Welcome from Chair, roll call, appointment of Secretary to take minutes
Meeting participants: ('Y' indicates attendance, '-' indicates absence)
LCSC Members:
Mike Adcock Y
Sally Chan -
Arofan Gregory -
Stig Korsgaard -
Monica Martin Y
Tim McGrath (Chair) -
Bill Meadows Y
Sue Probert -
Deborah Quezadaz Y
Marion Royal (Vice Chair) Y
Terry Schager -
Lisa Seaburg Y
Ray Seddigh -
Michael Seubert -
Alan Stitzer -
Gunther Stuhec -
Dagmar Wachtmann -
Nigel Wooden -
Peter Yim -
Guests/Observers:
Jon Bosak Y
Mark Crawford Y
Jack Gager Y
Anne Hendry Y
Ken Holman Y
Marion Royal Y
There is not a quorum present.
Anne will take minutes.
2. Acceptance of previous minutes; open action items.
No quorum, so acceptance of previous minutes postponed until next meeting.
Open action items:
20030304-04: Tim review HL7 comments - Done.
20030318-03: Bill & Mike publish sample instance issues. - In progress
20030318-06: Mike A. - draft of methodology paper. - In progress
20030401-01: QA Team identify issues prior to the f2f. - In progress
3. Work Plan for 1p00 release.
a. Analysis report (Sue)
Not available.
b. Modeling report (Mike)
We need to go through a similar excercise we went through earlier -
do a comparison between original model and spreadsheets, but do this
with the spreadsheets after we have incorporated the new comments,
to make sure everything fits together. This may continue after the F2F
because probably won't have comments completely worked into material
by end of f2f.
There are some issues we need to address quickly, such as the mandatory
ID. Gunther has sent the Common Core Components paper to the lists.
This should be reviewed and discussed before the F2F.
c. QA Team report (Marion)
The QA team is making good progress on the comments.
Still a few issues needing attention by ndr (qa dependencies).
Will be reviewing new and open comments through next week.
Tim has reviewed HL7 comments - those will be incorporated.
A few other comments were received this week.
4. Other business:
a. Chairs meeting
Jon is organizing a meeting of the SC Chairs and the OASIS Kavi team
to discuss Kavi issues. Candidate dates for the next meeting are:
Thursday 8am PT (this week or next)
Monday 8am PT
Friday 8am will not work because it collides with the QA meeting
Marion, Mark, Ken, and Lisa call all make Thursday or Monday at 8am.
b. Mark:
CCTS is out for step 6 of un/cefact open development process -
simple verification and so is looking for external organizationss
to verify that they have in fact implemented v 1.9 of ccts and that
it works for them - that there are no substantive issues.
UBL would need to submit an implementation verification form.
The bulk of the conformance is in LC.
Fill out and presnt to Jon for formal submission to CCTS:
a) agree to do the verification
b) identify someone w/in LC to prepare verification from
c) submit (as soon as possible)
Mark will send information to the LCSC aliaS and Marion will begin
the discussion for submission.
also ccsd in process of preparing supp. verification
c. Forms Presentation SC
Ken Holman is starting the new FP SC.
Ken will attend the LCSC Friday QA calls to give his evaluation of
any comments that come in related to forms presentation
(eg. comments from David Burdett).
Please let Ken know if there is a need for any additional scenarios.
FPSC will work on sceanrios, code lists, and any other requests
from LCSC. Please think about needs and come back to FPSC with
any specific requests. Ken will post this request to the LCSClist.
It would be helpful to have more scenarios that industries could use
as starting points, but it would be best to put off making new
scenarios until after the comments have been reiewed and incorporated.
We will probably have to update the existing ones. There should be
a core set of scenarios that is released with the package. Others
can be added, but the core ones should remain with the distribution.
We should also take care in how the sample scenarios are named,
not to imply they represent different functional categories.
Currently the labels may be distracting from the objective
of what they represent. Ken has noted to review the sample
scenario documentation.
5. Adjourn: 18:00 GMT
6. Open/New Action Items
20030318-03: Bill & Mike publish sample instance issues.
20030318-06: Mike A. - draft of methodology paper.
20030401-01: QA Team identify issues prior to the f2f.
20030408-01: All - review Gunther's Common Core Components paper before F2F.
20030408-02: Mark send CCTS Implementation Verification information
20030408-03: Marion start discussion for CCTS impl. verification process.
20030408-04: Jon submit CCTS implementation verification form.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]