[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: UBL-C
email we discussed.
------------- Begin Forwarded Message -------------
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 13:00:42 -0500
From: pankaj.patel@convergys.com
Subject: Re: UBL-C
To: Bill Meadows <Bill.Meadows@Sun.COM>
Cc: tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au, dennis.morin@convergys.com
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CVGSMTP1/SRVR/CVG(Release 5.0.11 |July 24,
2002) at 03/24/2003 01:01:06 PM
Original-recipient: rfc822;Bill.Meadows@Sun.COM
Bill,
Thanks again for your response.
It seems that OASIS web-site is having access problems today/now so
I could not access the url that you have listed for the bylaws of the WG.
I will check it out later.
I understand need for Convergys to become member of OASIS/UBL WG
in order to attend meetings/contribute. I am working on making the case
for Convergys to become member of OASIS and your email (view of the
WG on Convergys thoughts/points) helps part of the case.
However, based my experience with other standards groups, having a guest
speaker
(for one WG meeting) should be at the discretion of the WG chair. Having an
invitation
from you/WG Chair to attend as a guest (or SME) in the BSS/OSS Standards
space (on a
WG conf. call for an hour with Convergys contributions) would go long ways
(allows for validation
and judging level of acceptance of Convergys thought leadership) for me to
make a stronger case
for joining the organization.
Given that WG thinks of highly of what we have provided so far, do you see
this (attend as guest)
as a possibility in next WG Conf. Call?
Please let me know if this will work or not.
Regards,
Pankaj
Bill Meadows
<Bill.Meadows@Sun To: Pankaj
Patel/CIMG/CVG@CVG
.COM> cc:
tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au
Subject: Re: UBL-C
03/21/2003 06:30
PM
Please respond to
Bill Meadows
Hi Pankaj,
Sorry for they delay in replying. The conference calls are limited to
members. See http://oasis-open.org/committees/ubl/lcsc/. We would be
happy to have Convergys join Oasis and UBL. I think you can contribute
a lot to the process.
The discussion around your comments have been very positive. I think
everyone
agrees that UBL needs to expand to include services. As far as UBL-C, it
would
probably be considered an extension. The Context Methodology group within
UBL is in the process of defining how specific industries will modify UBL
documents for industry specific needs and maintain UBL compliance. This
would
be another good place for Convergys to participate if you are willing to
join
the Oasis process.
Cheers,
Bill
> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 13:52:11 -0500
> From: pankaj.patel@convergys.com
> Subject: Re: UBL-C
> To: Bill Meadows <Bill.Meadows@Sun.COM>
> MIME-version: 1.0
> X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CVGSMTP1/SRVR/CVG(Release 5.0.11
|July
24, 2002) at 03/07/2003 02:01:05 PM
> Original-recipient: rfc822;Bill.Meadows@Sun.COM
>
>
> Bill,
> Thanks for getting back to me.
> Couple of thoughts to move this forward:
> - Can Convergys participate (as a guest) in one of your meetings
via
> voice conf. call?
> - Can you share with us what are the views of the group on
Convergys
> proposal (UBL-C)?
>
> If you want, we can talk prior to your next WG meeting.
> Pankaj
>
>
>
>
> Bill Meadows
> <Bill.Meadows@Sun To:
pankaj.patel@convergys.com
> .COM> cc:
> Subject: Re: UBL-C
> 03/07/2003 01:40
> PM
> Please respond to
> Bill Meadows
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Pankaj,
> I submitted your comments. We have not yet addressed them. We spent
the
>
> entire face to face working the examples (so we are a little behind).
But,
> they are documented, and will be responded to. Let me know if you have
> any other comments/suggestions.
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
>
> > Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:43:48 +0530
> > From: pankaj.patel@convergys.com
> > Subject: UBL-C
> > To: Bill.Meadows@Sun.COM
> > MIME-version: 1.0
> > X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CVGSMTP1/SRVR/CVG(Release 5.0.11
> |July
> 24, 2002) at 02/28/2003 12:12:37 AM
> > Original-recipient: rfc822;bill.meadows@sun.com
> >
> > Bill,
> > Any updates on what we (Convergys) are proposing below?
> > Thx.
> > Pankaj
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Pankaj Patel
> >
> > To: Bill Meadows
> > <Bill.Meadows@Sun.COM>
> > 02/03/03 06:24 PM cc: Dennis
> > Morin/CIMG/CVG@CVG, Dale
> > Peterson/CIMG/CVG@CVG
> >
> > Subject: Re: OASIS
News-27
> > January 2003(Document link:
> > Pankaj Patel)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Bill,
> > It was nice talking with you. We really appreciate your help in
providing
> > the clarification on UBL directions under OASIS.
> > Instead of current UBL scope (EDI or EDIFACT specific), as we talked
and
> > promised our comments to you,
> > we at Convergys would like to see the following type of work (under
UBL-T
> > or UBL-C Technical Committee)
> > carried forward. We would be interesting in providing support for such
> > standardization efforts (if approved):
> >
> > OSS/BSS Business Language Standards (I would call it - UBL-C for
> > Universal Business
> > Language for Communications Industry - that would include):
> >
> > Object Definition and Interactions for:
> > - Events (types, field definitions)
> > - Account (attributes - public, private/custom)
> > - Subscription (types)
> > - RateFactor (types, associations)
> > - Customer (types/profiles)
> > - Services (types, public/private)
> > Interface definitions using WSDL
> > Discovery of Objects/Services via UDDI
> > Transport mechanism (SOAP over TCP/IP)
> >
> > Hope this helps in your meetings this week. We will follow-up with you
in
> > next 10 days.
> > Pl. call me if you have any questions or want me to participate in your
> > meetings to further
> > explain this note.
> > Pankaj
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Bill Meadows
> >
> > <Bill.Meadows@Sun To:
> > pankaj.patel@convergys.com
> > .COM> cc:
> >
> > Subject: Re: OASIS
> News-27
> > January 2003
> > 01/31/2003 01:56
> >
> > PM
> >
> > Please respond to
> >
> > Bill Meadows
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Pankaj,
> > My appologies for not responding sooner. I am not sure of the nature
> of
> > your
> > questions, so I may not be the best person to answer them. If you
would
> > like to
> > try to call me at about 3pm EST we can have a short discussion ( I have
a
> > 3:30
> > commitment). I can be reached at (510) 574-9494.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bill Meadows
> > Technical Editor UBL Library Content SC.
> >
> > > From: pankaj.patel@convergys.com
> > > Subject: OASIS News-27 January 2003
> > > To: bill.meadows@Sun.COM
> > > Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:48:17 -0500
> > > X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CVGSMTP1/SRVR/CVG(Release 5.0.11
> > |July
> > 24, 2002) at 01/29/2003 06:05:36 PM
> > > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Bill,
> > > As per this announcement on UBL,
> > > we at Convergys have some quesitons that we would like to ask you.
> > > Can you please let me know when we can call you and provide your
> contact
> > #?
> > > This week, friday PM EST would be good with me.
> > > Please feel free to call me on my cell (If I am not at my desk).
> > > Thanks
> > > Pankaj
> > > 513-723-2018 (w)
> > > 513-235-3424 (cell)
> >
--
"NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is
intended by Convergys Corporation for the use of the named individual or
entity to which it is directed and may contain information that is
privileged or otherwise confidential. If you have received this electronic
mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without
copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email
or by telephone (collect), so that the sender's address records can be
corrected."
------------- End Forwarded Message -------------
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]