[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [roe] Fwd: eGov review of UBL: A number of issues found in Denmark
LCSC review team, I haven't heard anything from Jouko, so I'm going to assume that he is on vacation and forward this input to you directly. Jon İİİİİİİİİİİİİİİİİİİİİ== From: "Mikkel Hippe Brun" <mhb@schemaworks.com> To: "'Jouko Salonen'" <jouko.salonen@republica.fi>, "'Tim Benson'" <tim.benson@abies.co.uk>, "'Tim Benson'" <tb@abies.co.uk>, <david.layton@gsa.gov>, <arthur.brunson@gsa.gov>, "'Palle Aagaard'" <PAA@itst.dk>, "'Michael Bang Kjeldgaard'" <mbk@itst.dk>, "òso-8859-1?Q?'René_Løhde'? <rel@itst.dk>, <jon.bosak@sun.com>, <juhani.koivunen@vm.fi>, <john.borras@e-envoy.gsi.gov.uk> Cc: "'Grant, Amabel'" <Amabel.Grant@ogc.gsi.gov.uk>, "'Leverington, Martin'" <Martin.Leverington@ogc.gsi.gov.uk>, "'Mark Leitch'" <ml@tritorr.com>, "'Paul Spencer'" <paul.spencer@boynings.co.uk>, "'Brian Nielsen'" <bni@itst.dk> Subject: eGov review of UBL: A number of issues found in Denmark Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 23:44:53 +0200 Dear Colleagues, We have attached a small contribution of UBL issues collected her in Denmark. The headlines are: * Some thoughts on how the eGov review team can contribute * Reconciliation of Invoice problem * Identification of Payer/Payment for reconciliation of incoming payments * Mandatory TypeCode in FinancialAccount * RequestedDeliveryDate and PromisedByDate should have representationTerm="DateTime" and not “Date” Regards Mikkel Hippe Brun & Brian Nielsen On Behalf of the Danish XML Committee Note. Mikkel will be on holiday from june 30th to july 18th. Contact Brian for issues related to this contribubtion.
20030629 Danish eGov review of UBL 8.pdf
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]