[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-lcsc] [roe] OAG comment: City and Country structures
This I am against. It confuses definitions and breaks CCTS, etc. Best Regards Stig Korsgaard M.Sc.E Standardisation Coordinator Tel: +45 3370 1083 Cell: +45 2121 8234 Mail: stk@finansraadet.dk Danish Bankers Association Amaliegade 7 DK-1256 Copenhagen K Tel: 3370 1000 Fax: 3393 0260 mail@finansraadet.dk www.finansraadet.dk -----Original Message----- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au] Sent: 4. juli 2003 04:35 To: ubl-LCSC@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [ubl-lcsc] [roe] OAG comment: City and Country structures To facilitate debate and consensus on the reviewed items, I am posting relevant issues as discussion points. The intention is that after a one week period the team shall resolve these issues. For example, this issue will be resolved at the call on Friday July 11th. Item 7. OAG have defined CitySubEntity and CountrySubEntity with a type attribute to qualify the value with some appropriate label (e.g. type=state, type=district). Multiple occurrences were allowed for each of these data elements to provide maximum flexibility. The names CitySubEntity and CountrySubEntity also implied whether these subentities were subsets of a city or country. This is similar to the AdministractiveArea approach of the OASIS CIQ group. This appears to impact on NDR rules that attributes are now defining the context. Do we see merit in this approach? -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-lcsc/members/leave_workgrou p.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]