[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-lcsc] [roe] OAG comment: DeliveryPoint
I too would not accept this. Agree with Alan! Best Regards Stig Korsgaard M.Sc.E Standardisation Coordinator Tel: +45 3370 1083 Cell: +45 2121 8234 Mail: stk@finansraadet.dk Danish Bankers Association Amaliegade 7 DK-1256 Copenhagen K Tel: 3370 1000 Fax: 3393 0260 mail@finansraadet.dk www.finansraadet.dk -----Original Message----- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au] Sent: 4. juli 2003 04:45 To: ubl-LCSC@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [ubl-lcsc] [roe] OAG comment: DeliveryPoint To facilitate debate and consensus on the reviewed items, I am posting relevant issues as discussion points. The intention is that after a one week period the team shall resolve these issues. For example, this issue will be resolved at the call on Friday July 11th. Item 8. The concern was with how to express a physical location for which address is not sufficient, for exmpale a dock at a wharf or warehouse. The OAG solution was to implement a generic DeliveryPoint data element within Address and allow it to be qualified with a type attribute. Is this a legitimate solution? Should we also then have PickupPoint? Do we acccept qualification by attributes? We currently use the RelevantLocation as a text BIE within DeliveryTerms as the nearest equivalent. -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-lcsc/members/leave_workgrou p.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]