Re: [ubl-lcsc] [Analysis & QA Team] 0.81 draft 9 models tocheck in and comment

["Stephen Green" <stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk>]

Tim

I especially like what you've done with the line references. I haven't checked everything in detail yet - for more thorough checking I prefer to wait and use the schemas (while making the instances). From what I've seen though it looks very good and I'm happy now with schemas being produced. :-)

I'd note that we now only have a GUID at document level whereas we used to have another at line level too. The requirement at document level is clearer than the line level requirement since GUID and Line Reference may seem sufficient, yet a GUID at line level may have some extra value. Perhaps having both seems a little excessive though.

All the best

Steve

>>> Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au> 09/04/03 09:05 AM >>>
Attached are the latest spreadsheet models which we hope will emerge as 
UBL 1.0.

Bill, can you check these in.

Stephen, you may wish to check the changelog and ensure I did the right 
thing (specifically with the rationalising of references)

QA Team, you may wish to make sure these are compliant with the naming 
rules (we had to change the naming formula).

I am also taking the opportunity to distribute the current class 
diagrams of these models.  these help to navigate the library (i 
 think).  I am attempting to bring these sub-diagrams together into a 
readable 'big picture' but it is proving harder than it appears.  I did 
not want this to hold up the next review steps.

If we can get agreement on these models on Tuesday's call then we just 
need to fix the codelist chnages and we are ready for the schema generator.


-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 189   fremantle    western australia 6160