[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-ndrsc] NDR Checklist Clarification
Ref Mark's response on no such thing as "qualifier representation term", I wonder why "qualifier representation term" has been carried along all the way from 0p70 till now. I did a quick scan over the spreadsheets and found empty values across all the "qualifier representation term" columns. So it did seem redundant. Mark, if as you said primary and secondary rep terms are lexicalyl synonymous, would it be absolutely unambiguous to just say "representation term"? Or are there cases where primary and secondary differences matter? LC, depending on Mark's response to above, suggest we may either rename the rep term and qualifier rep term columns, or remove the qualifier rep term. But let's hear from Mark first. Best Regards, Chin Chee-Kai SoftML Tel: +65-6820-2979 Fax: +65-6743-7875 Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net http://SoftML.Net/ On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, CRAWFORD, Mark wrote: >>The CCTS specifies primary and secondary representation terms. >>Both are lexically synonimous to "representation term". There >>is no such thing as "qualifier representation term". If LC has >>that in the spreadsheet, then they need to clarify and ensure >>conformance with CCTS. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chin Chee-Kai [mailto:cheekai@softml.net] >> Sent: Thu 9/18/2003 10:14 PM >> To: UBL NDRSC >> Cc: >> Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] NDR Checklist Clarification >> >> >> >> >> R13: >> ---------- >> For every primary representation term used in the UBL model, a named >> complex type MUST be defined. >> ---------- >> R14: >> ---------- >> For every secondary representation term used in the UBL model, a named >> complex type MUST be defined. >> ---------- >> >> How do "primary representation term" and "secondary representation >> term" relate to each other, and to "representation term" and >> "qualifier representation term"? Are they 4 different concepts, >> or some are synonyms or something else? >> >> In the spreadsheet models, there are only "qualifier representation >> term" and "representation term". Please clarify. >> >> >> >> >> R90: >> ----------- >> A RootSchema in one UBL namespace that is dependant upon type definitions >> or element declarations defined in another namespace MUST NOT import >> schema modules from that namespace. >> ----------- >> >> What is this talking about?? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Best Regards, >> Chin Chee-Kai >> SoftML >> Tel: +65-6820-2979 >> Fax: +65-6743-7875 >> Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net >> http://SoftML.Net/ >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-ndrsc/members/leave_workgroup.php. >> >>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]