[Fwd: Re: UBL 1.0 draft 6]

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>]

 Here are the latest spreadsheet models for discussion at Friday's QA/LC
call.

NB Sue's code sests and values are not in this yet.  All other recommended
changes have been applied, so we are near to final with this.

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:	Re: UBL 1.0 draft 6
Date:	Thu, 25 Sep 2003 21:36:55 +0100
From:	"Stephen Green" <sg007e7219@blueyonder.co.uk>
To:	"Stephen Green" <stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk>, <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>, <cheekai@softml.net>

Tim and Chee-Kai

Here are the draft 6 models as promised - minus Sue's work which will have
to be postponed till Saturday (draft 7?)

All the best

Steve



----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Green" 
To: ; 
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 7:56 PM
Subject: UBL 1.0 draft 6


Tim and Chee-Kai

Sue will need to put off her work on the catalogue code values till Saturday
so my plan is to finish my part (namespaces, etc - models already done) and
send the set of spreadsheets to Chee-Kai as draft 6 in time for the Friday
QA call.

Chee-Kai: if you have time to produce schemas, I've been asked by NDRSC if
the schemas might be forwarded to NDR as well as to LCSC.

I guess we'll have to have a further draft (7) with Sue's new codelist
values - though it would only be the codelist schemas which change.

On the subject of the problems with codes in the cct schema - there is
discussion going on among the TBG people, etc via Sue in response to my
message to Gunther and Garrett (at the request of Jon/NDRSC). Hopefully Sue
can give feedback on Friday. I gather there is considerable feeling that
something has to be done about the cct schema but what and when we'll have
to see. Is it a matter for San Francisco or 1.0 proper?

All the best

Steve

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160

UBL-1-0-alpha-models-draft-6.zip