[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-lcsc] CCT, RT, DT Files with fixed Major:Minor numbering
<xsd:schema targetNamespace="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:DataTypes:1:0-alpha" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:rt="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:RepesentationTerms:1:0-alpha" xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:DataTypes:1:0-alpha" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified">* in Representationterm.xsd: it still references the OAGI WG not UBL, as in...
<xsd:import namespace="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:RepesentationTerms:1:0-alpha" schemaLocation="RepresentationTerms_1p0-alpha.xsd"/>
<!--OAGI Core Component WG Datatypes based on ebXML Core Component Specification V1.90-->* in Representationterm.xsd: what is CodeContent used for?
Hello Tim, I'm fixing this problems now. I made with LanguageCode a suggestion for using the code lists within the representation schema. I have seen that was a positive reaction in the NDRSC, therefore I'm adding the other code lists into the representation term schema, today. Kind regards, Gunther -----Original Message----- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au] Sent: Donnerstag, 9. Oktober 2003 09:14 To: Lisa-Aeon Cc: UBL-NDR; Ubl-Lcsc Subject: Re: [ubl-lcsc] CCT, RT, DT Files with fixed Major:Minor numbering thanks for this rapid turnaround. obviously, it is critical we get a valid set before we can move ahead with the generator. unfortunately i have some problems with these schemas. this leads me to ask whether NDR has reviewed them in practice rather than just in principle? firstly, i get errors whenever RT tries to restict anything.. for example, in representationTerms i get "undefined value for base" when it tries to extend CodeContent ie. <xsd:complexContent> <xsd:extension base="rt:CodeContent"/> </xsd:complexContent> - similarly in Data Types.XSD with TextType, MeasureType, etc.. perhaps am i doing something wrong? also, i noticed that the CCT for DateTime is a simpleType restriction. Doesn't NDR rule 58 contradict rule 136 ? finally, when was it agreed to build in a language code (ISO639) to these? why not currency, measure, etc..? i thought we had discussed this with NDR on a joint call 2 weeks ago and it was never mentioned that this was going to happen. can someone say whether this model fits with our code list architecture? Lisa-Aeon wrote:Here are the same CCT, RT, and DT files I sent out earlier today only these have the Major:Minor-alpha numbering fixed in the namespaces. Throw out the old ones, and use these. If you have any problems, email me. Lisa ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Lisa Seaburg AEON Consulting Website: http://www.aeon-llc.com Email: lseaburg@aeon-llc.com Alternative Email: xcblgeek@yahoo.com Phone: 662-562-7676 Cellphone: 662-501-7676 "If you obey all the rules, you miss all the fun." -Katharine Hepburn ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003 To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-lcsc/members/leave_workgroup.php.
-- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]