OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl-lcsc message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [code] updated Catalogue and some draft schemas


Hi,

A couple of items from last week's mail that are still open.

>Open Items:
>
>- Language
>  Jon created a Language code list, but we have no language code BBIE.
>  We have a Language ABIE in Reusable, which contains an 'ID' BBIE with
>  a description of "identifies the language by a code", and a Language
>  'Name' BBIE described as "the common name of the language", and a
>  language 'Locale Code' BBIE, described as "identifies the locale/location
>  where the language is spoken or used in writing".  How do we use the
>  language codes within Language ID (or do we)?  Do we need this list?
>
Currently the 'language' code list is not being used.  How do we plug it 
in to this (Language) structure?

>
>- CountrySubentityCode
>  In the Catalogue, this item is noted as being ISO 3166 as well.
>  However, I'm not sure if this would be what was intended.
>  Problem is that there is nothing I've seen that has the term "Subentity".
>
>  What there is under the UN LOCODEs are:
>     - "Subdivision"s, which for the U.S., for example, would be states
>       (eg. California) and for the U.K. would be, for example, Essex
>        This is ISO 1366-2 (as opposed to ISO 3166-1 for the country code).
>  and
>     - "Location"s, which seems to contain cities
>       (eg. San Francisco, London).
>
>  When we use "Subenity", to which of these are we referring?  The ISO
>  Subdivision codes are quite numerous, so we should decide soon how
>  critical it is to have these.
>
Do we punt on CountrySubentityCode for now?

Thanks,
Anne




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]