[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-lcsc] pre-draft model for appraisal and initial change log
After long debate WRT changing the spreadsheets to match TBG specific format, it was decided that it did not matter because the dictionary name that is generated in the UBL spreadsheet is not used. The tools (EDIFIX) generate these fields based on the TBG 17 macros (which we agree should be definitive in function – not methodology). It would be nice if our formula produced the same results as the TBG 17 as we work on the content so that we can see immediate impact on dictionary name, but its not critical. Keeping the format of the model as we now have it permits an opportunity for backward compatibility with other tools.
Tim, Mikkel, LCSC,Here, attached is a spreadsheet I'll be taking as a starting point for my changes from 1.0 beta to 1.0 draft 1.I've called this version draft 0 as it should be equivalent to beta.Mikkel had made changes:combining all models into one spreadsheetcombining TBG17 and UBL model formats into the one spreadsheetbut there a few changes I've made myself,the spreadsheet worksheet name to UBLadding formulas as agreed in the meetingplus I thought I'd better reverse the removal of the property noun and possessive,as I seem to remember being agreed in the meetingthen I've also moved things a little and removed columns I thought were redundantat the end of the TBG17 area (to keep it in line just with TBG17's format), etcIf these changes are disputed and amended via the Tuesday call this week I'll easilybe able to add the content changes to whatever is agreed, but I neededa sure starting point as far as I think we've agreed.Apologies if this means you have to amend the tool Mikkel, but I think this is what wasagreed in the meeting and the changes I think will be small- though the columns may be in different places with some removed.I did leave out the removed DataType-related columns from the UBL side,so apologies again to those who might try using UBLish in future in that thescript will of course need changes beside NDR-related ones (unless empty columns are added firstbefore generating - along with removal of TBG17 columns and some rows at the top perhaps).Now I'll start making the model content changes.I've attached, in advance, my proposed initial changes to the contents.The next version I'll call UBL 1.0 draft 1All the bestSteve
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-lcsc/members/leave_workgroup.php.
-- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]